Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,520 posts)
10. So you are positing a level of technology not found anywhere in the world from that time
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 05:54 PM
Jan 2013

and excusing the total lack of evidence for it on them only living on a now-flooded seashore, rather than living on the main area of an island, where there's no evidence whatsoever, on any of the islands? The Pacific islands have steep sides; very little area of land will have been lost from sea level rise.

But you think this evidence-free hypothesis should have been followed by this man, in favour of the one with archaeological evidence, because "the Siberian land bridge theory is all but dead" and "island hopping in outrigger canoes is the more logical explanation".

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Paul Salopek: Going for a...»Reply #10