Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
10. Yup. That's why steady state in its current form has been discredited.
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 12:01 AM
Apr 2012

On the other hand, I could use fairies dancing on gas molecules to explain Brownian motion. But just because Brownian motion can be observed doesn't mean that it my dancing fairies theory is the ONLY explanation for what was observed. Sometime in the future some brilliant young theorist might come up with a non-Big Bang explanation for CMB. Someday. Maybe. To pretend we have all the final answers here and now is to deny the very processes of science. Who knows what tomorrow will bring? Certainly not me.

Every time we turn around science hands us another startling new discovery. There's no way I'm going to close the door prematurely on the future of science. And as a non-scientist with no professional reputation to protect I can afford to make all the idle speculations I like in perfect safety. Being right all the time is not in my job description.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Mysteries of "The Re...»Reply #10