Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)

11. Idle speculation isn't how progress is made.

Reply to Speck Tater (Reply #10)

Sun Apr 1, 2012, 01:45 AM

Apr 2012

While it's possible that some day, every part of the Lambda-CDM model will be replaced by some new revolutionary cosmological model, I sincerely doubt it because of the sheer number of phenomena that new model will have to explain at least as well as the current one.

What's far more likely is a number of refinements. A revolutionary new model would have to not only explain everything that Lambda-CDM explains, but a decent number of things it doesn't. Pretty much everything short of that will merely be a refinement.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mysteries of "The Redshift Desert" --Why Do Galaxies in the Early Universe Appear Old? [View all] n2doc Mar 2012 OP

Although shunned by the herd, there are still viable alternatives to the Big Bang theory. Speck Tater Mar 2012 #1

??? There either was a beginning of time or there wasn't. You can't have both. DetlefK Mar 2012 #3

Steady State hypothesized the continuous creation of new hydrogen Speck Tater Mar 2012 #7

Explain the CMB. laconicsax Mar 2012 #9

Yup. That's why steady state in its current form has been discredited. Speck Tater Apr 2012 #10

Idle speculation isn't how progress is made. laconicsax Apr 2012 #11

Two things. Speck Tater Apr 2012 #12

All of the advances by those you quote built on the work of others. laconicsax Apr 2012 #13

What was that famous quote? Speck Tater Apr 2012 #14

And yet, Copernicus didn't idly speculate. laconicsax Apr 2012 #15

Ah, so your real quibble is with the word "idle". Speck Tater Apr 2012 #16

I'm I the only one who believes redshift can be affected by compressed and/or expanded space? tridim Mar 2012 #2

Compressing space won't help DetlefK Mar 2012 #4

Who said the Universe is flat on a cosological scale? tridim Mar 2012 #5

Light isn't sound; space isn't air longship Mar 2012 #6

The WMAP experiment did. laconicsax Mar 2012 #8