Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

drm604

(16,230 posts)

9. I'm not so sure that it would have seriously affected the planet.

Reply to MineralMan (Reply #8)

Fri May 25, 2012, 10:22 AM

May 2012

The stuff about planes crashing and power grids going down was a bit over the top, but it could have caused some disruptions and major inconveniences if it hadn't been fixed.

For a number of years afterwards I ran into various date issues because of code that hadn't been fixed. Some of no consequence, e.g. a simple date display, and some that messed up some accounting totals or whatever and had to be fixed.

If everyone had waited until after the fact it could have caused some real disruptions for a few months or more.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

the WHO fucked up on the Swine Flu pandemic, and so it's a Big Pharma shill! [View all] Odin2005 May 2012 OP

I worked as a doctor with the WHO. laconicsax May 2012 #1

If the scientists had dismissed it and said there was no threat, that would be proof of shilling too TheWraith May 2012 #2

Can you elaborate for those of us who haven't been following Fukushima that closely? laconicsax May 2012 #3

I think this is all symptomatic of the rabid anti-intellectualism that abounds. trotsky May 2012 #4

I'm a programmer drm604 May 2012 #7

Yup. It's amazing how much CT folks are willing to ignore MineralMan May 2012 #8

I'm not so sure that it would have seriously affected the planet. drm604 May 2012 #9

BTW regarding swine flu TZ May 2012 #5

I have pointed that out before and I have given up trying... Odin2005 May 2012 #6

My recollection of the swine flu era SheilaT Jun 2012 #10

And by an amazing coincidence... laconicsax Jun 2012 #11

Yes, it really was a relatively low occurrence. SheilaT Jun 2012 #12

It's easy to make those appraisals after the fact. laconicsax Jun 2012 #13

At the time, one soldier, one person only, at Ft. Dix, got SheilaT Jun 2012 #14

immunity from the previous swine flu epidemic played a role TZ Jun 2012 #15

I'm guessing 1912 is a typo. It was 1918. SheilaT Jun 2012 #16