Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

8. I hope so (nt)

Reply to thomservo (Reply #6)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 11:58 AM

Jan 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

While we're at it: where would you put the top end of "middle class"? [View all] Recursion Jan 2016 OP

Depends where you live whitefordmd Jan 2016 #1

It's more than three times the Manhattan median household income Recursion Jan 2016 #4

I usually always agree with you, but the medians are irrelevant IMO. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #9

The term middle class is subjective... thomservo Jan 2016 #2

Very true Recursion Jan 2016 #3

The results should be interesting. thomservo Jan 2016 #6

I hope so (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #8

Seems to be roughly Gaussian so far Recursion Jan 2016 #5

We should ditch the term altogether, JayhawkSD Jan 2016 #7

I put $70k-$90k... thomservo Jan 2016 #10

I selected over 210 katsy Jan 2016 #11

i put 130-150 restorefreedom Jan 2016 #12

If the bottom 10% is poor/poverty shouldn't Downwinder Jan 2016 #13

In my head I use thirds Recursion Jan 2016 #14

Sounds reasonable. Downwinder Jan 2016 #15

Depends on how many kids, if any, as well as where you live. JudyM Jan 2016 #16

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»While we're at it: where ...»Reply #8