Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I'm beginning to see the gap as unbridgeable. [View all]Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)126. Why do you feel your links support your claim? One of them is a book review that does not
in any way suggest that money in politics is not the culprit. How do you explain bills
not getting passed when Americans overwhelmingly approve their passage?
It is literally impossible to split the affect of money from social issues as well.
Poverty and racism inextricably linked, says UN expert
http://www.socialwatch.org/node/16324
Nearly every issue we face as a nation is caught in the grip of corruption
http://www.globalresearch.ca/study-congress-literally-doesnt-care-what-you-think/5466723
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
305 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I know of two moderate Republicans who are now supporting HRC. And they'd
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2016
#299
sadly, HRC is the choice that will lead to Trump -- it's math. anyone can add it up.
nashville_brook
Feb 2016
#212
I could care less what the party designation is if it's not LIBERALS in control.
Lizzie Poppet
Feb 2016
#305
Too right! I have said from the beginning that Hillary is by far Bernie's toughest opponent.
Dustlawyer
Feb 2016
#267
When your wrongs keep adding up, it's time to look at where we are in the most corrupt campaign..
MrMickeysMom
Feb 2016
#153
No its a contest between pragmatic traditional Democratic values vs. continued right wing ologarchy
LiberalLovinLug
Feb 2016
#209
"Pragmatism"= "we don't want to fight the GOP, because we hold the same positions
Lorien
Feb 2016
#232
Pragmatism is an excuse to accept a corrupt culture that has given us 16 million children living in
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#237
This class war isn't between Democrats and Republicons. The class war is between the
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#238
The gap between Sanders and Clinton is far greater than the gap between Clinton and the
Doctor_J
Feb 2016
#262
yeah, what sort of campaign RELIES on people being too broke to donate to anyone else
MisterP
Feb 2016
#31
Actually, I agree with you about corporate money. But, as long as that is allowed by current laws,
Hoyt
Feb 2016
#10
Do you care to elaborate or just post your usual BS. If GOPers are taking it, why not our candidate
Hoyt
Feb 2016
#25
Perhaps there are some who are unaware how long the vetting process is before someone gets here.
nolabels
Feb 2016
#35
I believe like you. If you want a level playing field you at least have to play on the same field.
Jitter65
Feb 2016
#130
"...so there is no reason to believe Clinton has to, or even will, repay them..."
CrispyQ
Feb 2016
#280
Well, you are just speculating based upon how you might react. We know for a fact, she got $280K
Hoyt
Feb 2016
#281
The photograph & footage of Bernie being arrested for what he believes tell you all you need to know
Merryland
Feb 2016
#13
The Primaries are far from over, but Pandora's Box is open and the cat is out of the bag.
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#14
The funny thing is that Obama, who overused that phrase, ended up taking a spork to
Warren Stupidity
Feb 2016
#19
That's a VERY interesting observation; I hadn't looked at it like that before,
closeupready
Feb 2016
#77
"This scare tactic doesn't work anymore because we HAVE ALREADY reached the point...........
DJ13
Feb 2016
#242
If I vote for Hillary in the general, I'm voting against the republican nominee
bhikkhu
Feb 2016
#37
I don't think the party is really a "big tent" anymore. it does not want to be
newthinking
Feb 2016
#58
For example, I saw a list of the things that Hillary does or doesn't support and I was okay with it.
AlbertCat
Feb 2016
#55
I'm in North Raliegh and you're right, there's no way Hillary can take NC in the general.
TIME TO PANIC
Feb 2016
#206
Might as well, if a Democrat doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell. n/t
TIME TO PANIC
Feb 2016
#125
In your OP you called it "the most urgent problem we face." So make up your mind. nt
ucrdem
Feb 2016
#99
I didn't contradict myself. Let me be clear: Hill SuperPacs are no better than Rubio
cali
Feb 2016
#288
Have the Dems ever deliberately jettisoned and alienated the left before, and won?
delrem
Feb 2016
#51
If I quit working, I can go back to indigent care at the county hospital. As I am working, I am
DhhD
Feb 2016
#119
HRC needs to pick Lloyd Blankfein as her VP. That way everything will be on the Up and Up.
LiberalArkie
Feb 2016
#57
We are talking different languages indeed, by design. Watch the way they twist the
silvershadow
Feb 2016
#84
Bear in mind that a million for Bernie is like 5-7 million superpac money for others.
Lucky Luciano
Feb 2016
#169
But...but...Clinton is against corporate funding...sometimes...maybe..a little bit..when convenient.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2016
#96
The thought of Wasserman Schultz being rewarded with a cabinet level position
Matariki
Feb 2016
#100
Why do you feel your links support your claim? One of them is a book review that does not
Jefferson23
Feb 2016
#126
With all due respect, your conclusions continue to point to a polluted electoral system.
Jefferson23
Feb 2016
#196
Oh get off it....Save your powder till the fall when it is needed against the GOP
Armstead
Feb 2016
#176
I try to understand Clinton supporters perspective but I admit it is more than difficult for me.
Jefferson23
Feb 2016
#143
This isn't about Sanders v. Clinton. It's about what happens after the nomination is settled.
onenote
Feb 2016
#151
The OP is about corruption in politics and who is best placed to confront it. The primary is
Jefferson23
Feb 2016
#171
Hillary supporters have established themselves as the opponents of progressive policy.
Maedhros
Feb 2016
#156
The fact that her supporters make excuses after excuses about how it's ok for her to take
davidpdx
Feb 2016
#247
The majority of Americans are NOT part of the wealth of this country. Even if you make a couple
RKP5637
Feb 2016
#180
Now you say you don't understand us, when half your posts say you know exactly what we think
CreekDog
Feb 2016
#304
We can't change any issue for the better without getting money out of politics first
Lorien
Feb 2016
#230
Allow me to speak your language. Third Way Speak twists my tongue into a fork. eom
Betty Karlson
Feb 2016
#250
The divide is clear. One finds a friend in multi-national corporations.
raouldukelives
Feb 2016
#268
Given the Proportional Distribution of delegates on the Dem side, in a two-way race it either has
JCMach1
Feb 2016
#277
"We have built a culture around pretending our government isn't really corrupt."
Smarmie Doofus
Feb 2016
#282
Word. It can't be fixed by an effective ad or an impressive debate performance
RufusTFirefly
Feb 2016
#301