Spread the love and support DU!
Become a monthly subscriber!
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Planned Parenthood launch...»Reply #291
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Planned Parenthood launching seven-figure pro-Clinton ad buy [View all]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

347 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Planned Parenthood launching seven-figure pro-Clinton ad buy [View all] hoosierlib Feb 2016 OP
WOW Guess they do not need my donation. oldandhappy Feb 2016 #1
+1000 nichomachus Feb 2016 #32
Mine either. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #78
no. this isn't about health care but if you look at the Hillary campaign roguevalley Feb 2016 #168
No, it's money that was donated to the POLITICAL ARM of PP. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #170
It's apparent that many of his supporters don't understand the difference MaggieD Feb 2016 #261
I know, then they "counter" this point in a manner that sounds EXACTLY like the Congressional R's PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #263
Yep MaggieD Feb 2016 #267
When you donate to PP, they channel the money were they see it will be Unknown Beatle Feb 2016 #324
That's completely false PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #329
So now Planned Parenthood goes under that old bus. Jackie Wilson Said Feb 2016 #326
What? Your piddly $27...Pffft. n/t libdem4life Feb 2016 #116
Mine,either. Lifelong Protester Feb 2016 #128
Likewise. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #173
There IS a difference: Bernie never said he'd be willing to compromise John Poet Feb 2016 #241
Good point! Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #244
Shouldn't this be their most important consideration? polly7 Feb 2016 #253
Bernie is for third trimester abortion on demand? MaggieD Feb 2016 #262
THIS. HRC willing to compromise with Repubs on abortion, Bernie is NOT. kath Feb 2016 #334
Absolutely. jwirr Feb 2016 #207
Or mine. 840high Feb 2016 #247
hmm. money for mamograms or for h. artislife Feb 2016 #335
I can see why they wouldn't want to back the single-issue candidate. nt Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #2
And the only candidate facing a potential criminal indictment is a better choice? hoosierlib Feb 2016 #4
At the moment, okasha Feb 2016 #115
No, we have what they usually do...start with the lower minions and see how badly they want libdem4life Feb 2016 #118
37 pages of illegal donations to bernie? that's a new one. roguevalley Feb 2016 #172
There should be more news okasha Feb 2016 #254
LOL SunSeeker Feb 2016 #255
Oh, please, I used to respect you but this is silly. TM99 Feb 2016 #268
Other foot. Shoe. okasha Feb 2016 #325
Hardly. TM99 Feb 2016 #330
The "indictment," okasha Feb 2016 #332
Hyperbolic nonsense. TM99 Feb 2016 #333
Seems the donors did it intentionally, which is a crime to be investigated Omaha Steve Feb 2016 #302
You do realize, I hope, thst the feds are not going to indict Hillsry okasha Feb 2016 #249
You do realize that you didn't read my post, or you would not have responded with such hubris. libdem4life Feb 2016 #313
LOL - not going to happen MaggieD Feb 2016 #269
Yes, can't support the SINGLE PAYER candidate. BillZBubb Feb 2016 #17
. UglyGreed Feb 2016 #21
I remember when the Hillarians were all up in everyone's face who decided not roguevalley Feb 2016 #176
Except it's not money from services to women... So? Agschmid Feb 2016 #312
From PP web site safeinOhio Feb 2016 #36
This is insane farleftlib Feb 2016 #49
Excellent point. Must be a girl thing. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Feb 2016 #68
Cecil Richards, Daughter of Tx Gov Ann Richards = Establishment Insider kristopher Feb 2016 #211
Didn't know Ann was her mum WhaTHellsgoingonhere Feb 2016 #218
"Must be a girl thing." brer cat Feb 2016 #229
Trying to figure out how many PAC's are affiliated with Planned Parenthood dragonfly301 Feb 2016 #131
I'm gonna answer my own question (I think) dragonfly301 Feb 2016 #135
I fell down the rabbit hole of Planned Parenthood on the open secrets website dragonfly301 Feb 2016 #292
+1 Beowulf Feb 2016 #184
Much better to back the one who says she'd compromise on abortion. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #89
Right?! polly7 Feb 2016 #252
Single? Bjornsdotter Feb 2016 #256
I can see why, too MaggieD Feb 2016 #264
Who is PP attacking? leftofcool Feb 2016 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author hoosierlib Feb 2016 #7
Apparently, another Democrat who has 100% lifetime PP record... The Redheaded Guy Feb 2016 #71
Um, no. They are totally separate organizations. PPFA and PPAF. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #76
Excuse me? There was no reason for the early endorsement. The Redheaded Guy Feb 2016 #85
I'm sure you will. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #88
better them than this person who says she's open to compromise on abortion roguevalley Feb 2016 #177
Only if the decision was between a woman and her doctor- considering her health and life. bettyellen Feb 2016 #227
And IF the R's would budge. Which, let's be honest, is like saying "if pigs flew" PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #232
YES! She was pointing out how unreasonable conservatives were being, and drawing the correct line bettyellen Feb 2016 #233
It's a joke that they are pretending to give a shit about reproductive freedom. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #242
Yeah, there is a lot of things and people that they are suddenly pretending to care about bettyellen Feb 2016 #245
As opposed to those who have been pretending for months? SwampG8r Feb 2016 #336
Loved your BLM is a rat fucking plot thread. Not. bettyellen Feb 2016 #337
I can tell you only read the header SwampG8r Feb 2016 #342
any compromise is compromise. No one but the woman and doctor should talk and if that's the roguevalley Feb 2016 #305
She was outlining the ONLY way she would support a restriction because that question was asked. bettyellen Feb 2016 #306
It's not "penalizing them for supporting a democrat" thesquanderer Feb 2016 #120
Please hold while I note your concern. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #121
One thing I never understood... thesquanderer Feb 2016 #138
condescension is the last refuge of someone who has nothing, thesquanderer roguevalley Feb 2016 #178
Absolutely a waste! wavesofeuphoria Feb 2016 #221
one thing i have learned this primary season is questionseverything Feb 2016 #338
When you put money in your pocket and other money in a wallet... kristopher Feb 2016 #214
You sound like the R's in Congress who grilled her about federal $ being "commingled" for abortions. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #216
No, I don't. kristopher Feb 2016 #220
Yes, you really do. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #224
Are you saying that those donating to the PAC won't donate that same money to the clinics? kristopher Feb 2016 #294
Ah, move the goalposts!! PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #296
That isn't moving the goalpost nikki kristopher Feb 2016 #297
Nobody is saying or has said he's the enemy, kris. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #298
Sure they are - they are attacking him to keep him out of the GE. kristopher Feb 2016 #300
The Sanders worshippers, in their minds shenmue Feb 2016 #171
If you're not with Bernie, you're against him MaggieD Feb 2016 #266
that is bullcrap Robbins Feb 2016 #5
“Hillary Clinton is the only candidate in this race who has made women’s health and rights a workinclasszero Feb 2016 #6
Except we can't have SINGLE PAYER! BillZBubb Feb 2016 #9
Single Payer might put Planned Parenthood out of business. w4rma Feb 2016 #123
Bingo zeemike Feb 2016 #166
They've lost my support... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #10
As if they had it. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #16
Yes...I donated $50 to them when my state attempted to strip funding... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #22
Both are TOTALLY pro-choice. One makes it a priority. Here's a detailed explanation: PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #28
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #31
I don't believe you read it. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #39
Yeah, I read it...read it a month ago too hoosierlib Feb 2016 #47
Your socks were found in the dryer. William769 Mar 2016 #345
Only one candidate is TOTALLY pro-choice. ieoeja Feb 2016 #46
Go read the link. Look at the chart. Dispute the comparison of ACTIONS. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #50
I would think that nothing is more important than safeinOhio Feb 2016 #53
I read the whole thing. It is an excellent job in preparation for the election. CTyankee Feb 2016 #243
And that money helps men and women who need it. JTFrog Feb 2016 #55
+1 eShirl Feb 2016 #56
Saying it doesn't make it true. Beowulf Feb 2016 #13
She prioritizes everyone's issues when she's talking to them TCJ70 Feb 2016 #18
Look at the chart. This is what they mean. This is not "talk". It's action. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #44
The Clintons, as a couple, have been more responsible for moving the US Rightward ... kristopher Feb 2016 #219
Thanks for what? BernieforPres2016 Feb 2016 #94
And hasn't got anything to show for it. Bernie has gotten more done for women's healthcare askew Feb 2016 #192
weird...Click on the link, look at the chart. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #199
The most powerful way to support women's health is SINGLE PAYER. CARE!???? BillZBubb Feb 2016 #8
No, they're not. notadmblnd Feb 2016 #104
Why would they be out of business? kristopher Feb 2016 #230
With everyone afforded health care, there wouldn't be a need for facilities for those who now can't notadmblnd Feb 2016 #236
Others in this thread have explained why your understanding is inaccurate. kristopher Feb 2016 #295
Single payer doesn't pick the providers. PP should be able to compete with any local clinic. bigbrother05 Feb 2016 #248
Yes, with their bad leadership and partisan politics I think I will send my PP donation to liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #163
So they're spending money AGAINST someone who fights for Democrats. Wilms Feb 2016 #11
No, they're spending money supporting a Democrat who has made women's health a priority. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #14
And indirectly attacking another... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #25
By getting in the way of Single-Payer. Wilms Feb 2016 #26
Thank you, Planned Parenthood!! PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #12
Shameless women. Strongly supporting a female candidate. What the fuck are they thinking? nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #15
IKR? workinclasszero Feb 2016 #23
Who pays for that ad? panader0 Feb 2016 #19
Link? Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #20
Added as requested hoosierlib Feb 2016 #29
Thank you! Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #42
This is not smart of them to do this. In past years I would jwirr Feb 2016 #217
Did you donate to PPFA or PPAF? PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #223
What a patently obvious piece of sophistry you're attempting. kristopher Feb 2016 #234
You sound like the R's in Congress who grilled her about federal $ being "commingled" for abortions. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #240
Your end of the communications process is broken kristopher Feb 2016 #299
Back atcha. I am done. The author of this OP is flagged for review. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #301
Remember this next time Planned Parenthood wants a donation. gordianot Feb 2016 #24
No problem, the rest of us will just triple our donations. leftofcool Feb 2016 #30
But if they can spend millions on campaign donations, why do they need donations from us? nichomachus Feb 2016 #40
If you aren't donating to the PAC then your money isn't going toward supporting any candidate. JTFrog Feb 2016 #70
That's petty. I will send them MORE. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #34
Can you believe some of this shit? nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #43
Yes. They've shown they are petty, vindictive, selfish people. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #45
Have you ever donated directly to their PAC? JTFrog Feb 2016 #72
What a risky move! Beowulf Feb 2016 #27
Exactly...they are just asking to get attacked by the right hoosierlib Feb 2016 #35
And apparently, it's all PP to some Sanders supporters... brooklynite Feb 2016 #37
What an odd response! Beowulf Feb 2016 #62
There is, though.PP went into great detail about it. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #65
That's the difference? Beowulf Feb 2016 #87
Because you're looking for negativity? Because you're bitter that it's not "your" candidate they PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #90
No, I'm bitter they endorsed. As I stated Beowulf Feb 2016 #111
Did you read their statement about it? It was pretty clear. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #114
Yes, I read it. Don't insult me. Beowulf Feb 2016 #126
Risk pissing off Sanders supporters who are turning into petty children about it? PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #130
Apparently you are the one who didn't read. Beowulf Feb 2016 #143
I'm certainly not calling all Sanders supporters children. Just those who say they're not donating PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #144
I don't think it's as petty as you do. Beowulf Feb 2016 #162
And yet, she's the only one of the two who has said she could compromise on abortion thesquanderer Feb 2016 #117
I believe that clip was blown way out of proportion. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #119
abortion is a decision for the woman and no one else questionseverything Feb 2016 #340
She didn't go down the slope. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #341
Sounds just like the Republicans who want to defund PP, they don't realize there is more to Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #160
Tell me what has Clinton done for planned parenthood? nt ladjf Feb 2016 #33
She was born with a uterus... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #38
Come on. Get serious. I really want to know if Hillary has done any more for Planned Parenthood ladjf Feb 2016 #48
Thank you Planned Parenthood and thanks for all you do for women leftofcool Feb 2016 #41
Before I met my wife she and her child were in pretty dire straits workinclasszero Feb 2016 #59
+1 leftofcool Feb 2016 #81
+ infinity n/t JTFrog Feb 2016 #75
one begins to wonder what they even bbgrunt Feb 2016 #51
No more donations from me. I donate to help with SERVICES, not to help Hillary win. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #52
I think this will discourage donations eShirl Feb 2016 #54
Yup. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #155
Um, no. They are totally separate organizations. PPFA and PPAF. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #157
What is it y'all Clinton supporters always say? TM99 Feb 2016 #273
Please show me where they have attacked Sanders. They have not and will not. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #275
Come on! TM99 Feb 2016 #277
They didn't. And they won't be attacking him. That's the reality. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #282
Are you naive?! TM99 Feb 2016 #284
Nope. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #286
Apparently yes, you are. TM99 Feb 2016 #288
lol PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #291
+1 kristopher Feb 2016 #309
PACs are just a way for people and organizations to do their dirty work and yet keep their liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #159
I am one of those people who do not think there is a whole jwirr Feb 2016 #237
Locked out of your own thread? These attacks on PP are pathetic. JTFrog Feb 2016 #57
He just sent me a nasty PM. I alerted on it. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #61
Not surprised. JTFrog Feb 2016 #66
He's Flagged for Review. (n/t) OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #79
He should be fucking banned. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #80
Months ago, IMO. OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #84
He should be after all the uterus posts! leftofcool Feb 2016 #105
Its a joke.... LexVegas Feb 2016 #110
Good. DCBob Feb 2016 #107
Then PP can put that seven figure amount into services sarge43 Feb 2016 #148
I guess all lower income women have all the healthcare they need. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #58
Good to know. Thanks for posting nt kstewart33 Feb 2016 #60
Are you a true Bernie supporter ? stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #63
Is that where our donations go? Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #64
Um, no. They are totally separate organizations. PPFA and PPAF. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #67
Nope. But that won't stop the spreading of misleading information on a Democratic website. n/t JTFrog Feb 2016 #74
why not save the $ for the GE? wtf? elehhhhna Feb 2016 #69
My thoughts exactly kracer20 Feb 2016 #179
It will backfire for them and for the CLinton's. / FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #73
Overplaying their hands seems to happen to a lot of those establishment supporters of Clinton's. eom Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #77
Results... Major Nikon Feb 2016 #82
time for me to kick in a few dollars. Thank you PP riversedge Feb 2016 #83
Cecile Richards must have anticipated this kind of backlash, unless she's completely naive. Kentonio Feb 2016 #86
lol, yeah, a handful of bitter people on the internet... PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #93
It was a large backlash, not a 'handful of people on the internet' Kentonio Feb 2016 #96
I would say the same to you abour "faux outrage" !! PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #98
I made my opinion very clear the day the story broke Kentonio Feb 2016 #133
Neat. Please hold while I note your concern. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #136
No doubt workinclasszero Feb 2016 #97
Hillary and Planned Parenthood should UglyGreed Feb 2016 #91
It's pretty clear. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #95
Hillary did not make that clear UglyGreed Feb 2016 #99
Anyone who is even a LITTLE active/interested in the topic should know that. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #102
LOL UglyGreed Feb 2016 #106
I suspect you have the "luxury" to read the first few words of the OP to which you replied. No? PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #109
That has nothing to do with UglyGreed Feb 2016 #112
BTW my girlfriend and now UglyGreed Feb 2016 #101
What a load BernieforPres2016 Feb 2016 #92
Good question, but I think I know why... kracer20 Feb 2016 #188
Great News! Thanks Planned Parenthood. Alfresco Feb 2016 #100
Thank you Planned Parenthood ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #103
*** sheshe2 Feb 2016 #129
They could use that money against anti-choice candidates TexasMommaWithAHat Feb 2016 #108
Since they became a partisan political group they don't need my donations. madfloridian Feb 2016 #113
Um they are totally separate organizations. PPFA and PPAF. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #122
Go to the PAC website. Cecile Richards and one other lady are IT. They are only names on PAC madfloridian Feb 2016 #132
k. It's like the Republicans in Congress who grilled her about federal $ being "commingled" for PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #137
"Planned Parenthood backed someone other than my candidate!" Tarc Feb 2016 #124
No, not true. madfloridian Feb 2016 #134
And they picked the candidate who they felt is the best one to advance that Tarc Feb 2016 #139
Surprising given her recent comments on abortion. Vinca Feb 2016 #125
PP shit the bed Prism Feb 2016 #127
The only candidate? TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #140
same with the Human Rights Campaign and League of Conservation Voters numbers MisterP Feb 2016 #201
Bad leadership. This will lose them a lot of political support and donations and with the liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #141
well, there goes likely thousands from me and mine stupidicus Feb 2016 #142
No problem, hubby and I will make up the difference. leftofcool Feb 2016 #164
. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #180
Cool. Add another $2000 to your donation. wavesofeuphoria Feb 2016 #239
Tell you what... kristopher Feb 2016 #258
indeed, the poor thing stepped in it stupidicus Feb 2016 #318
So you are wealthy enough to TM99 Feb 2016 #274
Most regular PP donors aren't that petulant PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #276
I didn't ask you the question. TM99 Feb 2016 #278
TFB PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #279
Don't have the guts TM99 Feb 2016 #283
This is a discussion board. I don't need your permission to post in a thread. You are free to PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #285
I am also free to dismiss you as well. TM99 Feb 2016 #287
Amen. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #289
yep, likely some of that "1%er", looking out for their own stuff stupidicus Feb 2016 #319
what an insulting and asinine suggestion stupidicus Feb 2016 #315
How about some refunds? moondust Feb 2016 #145
Um, no. They are totally separate organizations. PPFA and PPAF. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #149
Right. moondust Feb 2016 #153
You sound like the R's in Congress who grilled her about federal $ being "commingled" for abortions. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #154
Right. moondust Feb 2016 #158
They are -- laughing doesn't change that fact obamanut2012 Feb 2016 #226
The Elites can spend all they want. SoapBox Feb 2016 #146
It is time for me to give PP some more money Gothmog Feb 2016 #147
Does this mean... Cryptoad Feb 2016 #150
No, it means Beowulf Feb 2016 #182
Thank you Planned Parenthood and don't be dissuaded by confused or vindictive Sanders' supporters. great white snark Feb 2016 #151
Good.......I guess they didn't like being called part of the establishment. Beacool Feb 2016 #152
Good... SidDithers Feb 2016 #156
Sad. So many icons and institutions crashing/burning needlessly and stupidly against Mt. Clinton... AzDar Feb 2016 #161
She doesn't want to get her hands dirty... HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #165
yet another example of leaders caring more about power and money than about liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #167
You know why Planned Parenthood has thrown in their lot with Hillary Clinton? Gene Debs Feb 2016 #169
I personally find it offensive to pretend the other mmonk Feb 2016 #174
Did you read their statement about it? PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #175
No, it is just that she has worked harder on healthcare for women and infants. bettyellen Feb 2016 #257
Disagree. To be pro-HRC isn't to be anti-Bernie. lark Feb 2016 #181
Thank you for being a voice of reason! PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #186
Thank you. lark Feb 2016 #194
“Hillary Clinton is the only candidate in this race who has made women’s health and rights a liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #187
Still not a slam on Bernie at all. lark Feb 2016 #190
Give me a break. I'm not buying that crap. liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #195
Hate sees only hate. lark Feb 2016 #196
Good bye. You are going on my ignore list. liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #197
YAY, good news. lark Feb 2016 #323
notice the word - "only" mikehiggins Feb 2016 #307
No, not talking about "is", lol. lark Feb 2016 #343
Here's the full statement PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #191
Wow is that a colossal mistake, they should save the buys for the general. That Guy 888 Feb 2016 #183
This really angers me as someone who has given money to them in the past. askew Feb 2016 #185
Did you donate to PPFA or PPAF? Also, where have you seen any "all out attack against" BS? PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #189
When you spend 7 figures saying Hillary is the 1 candidate who has made women's healthcare askew Feb 2016 #198
They have not attacked BS and will not be attacking BS. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #200
Spending 7 figures on a deceitful ad campaign that tries to argue Hillary is the best candiate askew Feb 2016 #203
Fine, I will make up the difference. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #204
I'm sure women in desperate need angrychair Feb 2016 #193
For the 100th FUCKING TIME, it's the POLITICAL ARM of PP. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #202
I understand that angrychair Feb 2016 #208
Where are the "attacks"? Now advocating for one candidate is an attack on the other? George II Feb 2016 #205
The statement "only candidate" TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #222
And that is why Sanders supporters think their candidate is being "attacked", when everyday..... George II Feb 2016 #238
I see the same around here from Hillary people. TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #246
Weight the Sanders "smears" vs. the Clinton "smears" here. Just look at the DU home page, under.... George II Feb 2016 #259
Donations to PP do not go to its PAC. LanternWaste Feb 2016 #206
Bernie Sanders would be ashamed of his supporters who are claiming to withhold donations to PPFA PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #210
It is shocking, isn't it? obamanut2012 Feb 2016 #231
Money's tight here at my house. jalan48 Feb 2016 #209
Your Tax Dollars At Work Yallow Feb 2016 #212
oh, bullshit. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #225
zero tax dollars at work obamanut2012 Feb 2016 #228
Excellent Stuckinthebush Feb 2016 #213
"Care. It’s what’s most important." - nice line there 0rganism Feb 2016 #215
Looks like they received the memo from Clinton headquarters Android3.14 Feb 2016 #235
Oh so this is where our donations are going. jillan Feb 2016 #250
Um, no. They are totally separate organizations. PPFA and PPAF. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #251
Excellent! MaggieD Feb 2016 #260
absolutely right Maggie, and I gave a detailed explanation of that in my post below. Thanks still_one Feb 2016 #270
I will try to make this simple, though I suspect some will ignore it because it doesn't fit into still_one Feb 2016 #265
Folks that don't know this.... MaggieD Feb 2016 #271
Because those people are not *really* involved. They are slackivists. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #272
Well I agree completely, but can't say it MaggieD Feb 2016 #280
Yes still_one Feb 2016 #310
Please do explain PAC's for all of the good people..... peace13 Feb 2016 #327
See post #265 MaggieD Feb 2016 #328
We know this. TM99 Feb 2016 #281
When the PP pac endorsement came out, the majority of outrages were not aware of the two separate still_one Feb 2016 #311
Have you disputed my discussion TM99 Feb 2016 #316
I am just reaffirming that you are aware, not others still_one Feb 2016 #320
Again, my point. n/t TM99 Feb 2016 #321
Odd that they're throwing away their money on MI, TX, and VA. winter is coming Feb 2016 #290
Even odder still TM99 Feb 2016 #293
I don't want my donations going to a commercial there are people who need their health services dr60omg Feb 2016 #303
Yes, it's completely seperate PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #304
Don't Care. grntuscarora Feb 2016 #314
I am concerned that it is separate and yet associated with the organizations name dr60omg Feb 2016 #317
Why not support both Hillary and Bernie? Why is Bernie excluded? Owl Feb 2016 #308
It's a foolish and stupid waste of money.. tokenlib Feb 2016 #322
Exactly. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #344
That money would be better spent on health services for low income women Matariki Feb 2016 #331
This is crazy kenfrequed Feb 2016 #339
I feel the same way about Sanders and his NOT keeping his promise to riversedge Mar 2016 #346
Bye, Felicia! PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #347
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Planned Parenthood launch...»Reply #291
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.