Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
42. Bush was Reagan's VP and the coattails were long.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 04:42 PM
Mar 2016

That seems to have been the major factor along with Willy Horton and how very silly Mike looked in a tank.

I would also conclude that was another political era, one still dominated by Reagan and the Cold War. We're in a different world, literally.

Correlations aren't universal laws of cause and effect, they only hold to true to a degree within specific boundaries.

Mostly a protest vote. They really want to pick her as our nominee for us. Don't fall for it. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #1
Nah.. they want "Bernie the socialist". DCBob Mar 2016 #2
You have to respect these people madaboutharry Mar 2016 #3
It is remarkable. DCBob Mar 2016 #5
They hate hillary 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #4
I think they hate him more. DCBob Mar 2016 #8
Not as much as they hate Trump. grossproffit Mar 2016 #9
How do you know? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #14
Well Hillary supporters say daily that republicans hate her 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #16
The more repubs that stay home the better. You understand that don't you? onenote Mar 2016 #19
Well duh 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #23
Virginia: important purple state onenote Mar 2016 #24
Nope compare dem turnout from 08 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #25
And repub turnout if Trump is candidate will be horrible onenote Mar 2016 #26
I'm not too sure 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #30
There is no correlation between turnout in primaries and the results in general onenote Mar 2016 #31
Back at cha. 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #32
Where do you get that stuff? There is a correlation, but it is weakening as voters become more leveymg Mar 2016 #40
Can you explain 1988 for me? onenote Mar 2016 #41
Bush was Reagan's VP and the coattails were long. leveymg Mar 2016 #42
Trump is an evil loser. Hillary would make him cry. grossproffit Mar 2016 #6
Even if some did, their turnout is way higher than ours right now revbones Mar 2016 #7
I think it could build if more and more speak out. DCBob Mar 2016 #10
Meh. Maybe if she gets the nom it will help cancel the lack of enthusiasm for her. revbones Mar 2016 #11
Definitely a strange election cycle Dem2 Mar 2016 #12
It's a few GOP elite who are upset with Trump who might jump ship. leveymg Mar 2016 #13
It remains to be seen if it will actually help. DCBob Mar 2016 #15
It is upon us. Super Tues is over. leveymg Mar 2016 #17
Yet according to latest CNN poll, Clinton tops Trump 52% to 44% among registered voters. DCBob Mar 2016 #18
That's not what polls were showing previously. leveymg Mar 2016 #20
This is a new one.. DCBob Mar 2016 #22
This is that same CNN/ORC poll you cited. I prefer hard turnout numbers anyway. leveymg Mar 2016 #33
You asked about polls. DCBob Mar 2016 #35
thnx leveymg Mar 2016 #36
Virginia: important purple state onenote Mar 2016 #21
4 candidates Livluvgrow Mar 2016 #27
There is no correlation between turnout in a primary and outcome in GE. onenote Mar 2016 #29
Here's a Harvard study and other data shows that turnout in primaries and the GE do correlate leveymg Mar 2016 #39
1988 onenote Mar 2016 #38
VA is an outlier. Research shows a correlation but it is diminishing leveymg Mar 2016 #37
Ironic, I think Sanders was hoping for those votes. bettyellen Mar 2016 #28
I see more and more of these every day. Trump is going down! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Republicans not voting or...»Reply #42