Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
19. ny times has been systematically anti-Bernie and pro-hillary; today's paper has an op ed
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:18 PM
Mar 2016

wherein the author mentions berniebros, etc....totally negative article....

the paper's layout dept chooses the worst photos of Bernie, trivializes his huge wins, champions hillary, etc....

one of hrc's huge donors, carlos slim, partly owns the paper; plus the paper represents the elite; it's an elite establishment

Astonishing greymouse Mar 2016 #1
EVERYONE WRITE TO THE PUBLIC EDITOR JackRiddler Mar 2016 #21
Marta & I have a digital subscription Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #22
Thank you Sir! passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #27
Glad noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #2
More ... ebayfool Mar 2016 #3
Media analysts have pointed out repeated that media has patently been trying to torpedo Bernie. merrily Mar 2016 #4
NY Times practices shoddy journalism farleftlib Mar 2016 #5
It's a rag. nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #15
Let people see what the allegedly liberal NYT's does in the pursuit of truth. K&R Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #6
Clinton Times is probably one step below tabloid trash for journalistic integrity. n/t Skwmom Mar 2016 #7
The Corp-Media is clearly behind Clinton the Ruling Class candidate. It only makes sense that the rhett o rick Mar 2016 #8
Apparently, the NYT thinks that what Europe already has is "promising the moon," and then some. reformist2 Mar 2016 #9
shows who he's threatening. nashville_brook Mar 2016 #10
Even Rolling Stone feels threatened by some ideas, it seems olymoly Mar 2016 #32
Was it a removed post on DU? GP6971 Mar 2016 #33
No. Removed on Rolling Stone. nt olymoly Mar 2016 #34
They've joined the WP in circling the wagons around their establishment favorite. pa28 Mar 2016 #11
Another conspiracy!!!!!!!!!!!!1!1! cosmicone Mar 2016 #12
How is this a conspiracy? It's an article presenting factual information. The Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #13
Don't let it bother you Nan passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #29
What a disgusting POSt you just made... ljm2002 Mar 2016 #23
The usual condescending dismissal.... AlbertCat Mar 2016 #24
NYT -- the same people who gave us Judith Miller and the Iraq invasion nichomachus Mar 2016 #14
Crap! I've been using it for "pee pee" paper for my Maltese for years.... Peregrine Took Mar 2016 #16
Hey, if your carefully trained animal craps on their paper, why shouldn't theirs? n/t winter is coming Mar 2016 #18
CIA gets NYT to listen. Octafish Mar 2016 #17
ny times has been systematically anti-Bernie and pro-hillary; today's paper has an op ed amborin Mar 2016 #19
K&R Babel_17 Mar 2016 #20
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #25
It Seems The Fourth Estate Has FINALLY DIED! Thomas Jefferson Has Been Eaten ChiciB1 Mar 2016 #26
Thought I had heard it all. There is more in the Taibbi article than the title suggests. Land Shark Mar 2016 #28
The Times isn't alone in that assessment BainsBane Mar 2016 #30
K&R vintx Mar 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Matt Taibbi's piece: How ...»Reply #19