Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Open primaries? [View all]
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
55. Carrying the "Open Primary" goal to it's logical conclusion...
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

...is to require the Jungle Primary system that California uses; e.g. everyone has the right to vote for ANY candidate running, and the top two go into a runoff.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Open primaries? [View all] Nye Bevan Mar 2016 OP
Forcing voters to declare party, and update registration so far in advance, ... pat_k Mar 2016 #1
Yes, they should never take a stand Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #7
You said it all right there Mnpaul Mar 2016 #42
Debbie Downer doesn't believe the Dems need a big tent. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #60
I think semi-closed primaries are the way to go... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #2
Agreed Dem2 Mar 2016 #3
If "Independent" was an immutable characteristic, I'd agree. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2016 #29
I like how we do it in NY. If you want to vote in our primary you should be a member of our party. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #4
It's an undue burden to require updated registration whenever you prefer a party's candidate. pat_k Mar 2016 #8
Sorry but if you become an independent you should be willing to give up the right to vote in the hrmjustin Mar 2016 #9
Sure, and it's no problem to require specific types of ID either. pat_k Mar 2016 #17
You don't need id in NY to vote. Try again. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #19
so how do you feel about any independent or republican that is starting to Karma13612 Mar 2016 #22
Call Albany but the nothing will change. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #24
I didn't ask what to do. I asked how you, as a Hillary Karma13612 Mar 2016 #28
Doesn't bother much. If you want to vote in the primary join our party. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #34
ok, but I think that's a very 'exclusionary' mindset. Don't you worry that you are Karma13612 Mar 2016 #41
No Hillary is over 20 percent ahead in NY so i have no worries. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #43
It's a primary, not the GE. ecstatic Mar 2016 #52
They get the choice in November to vote then. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #49
wow, so just because it isn't provide for in the Constitution, then it doesn't Karma13612 Mar 2016 #53
I don't believe election laws should be different from state to state. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #56
I'm speaking about undue burdens in general. pat_k Mar 2016 #45
Clara, I do declare I am having a spell, fetch me my fainting salts Tarc Mar 2016 #11
The warning part is just an excuse. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #48
The state should have no role in helping any political party to target voters. pat_k Mar 2016 #58
Agree. djg21 Mar 2016 #12
I don't believe there are any states that permit voting in multiple primaries. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #51
same here in arizona, but DesertFlower Mar 2016 #31
In NY you have to change your registration 6 months before the primary. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #35
holy moly. here in arizona DesertFlower Mar 2016 #47
They do it in backward North Carolina marions ghost Mar 2016 #5
A Closed Primary means a State(s) are holding a state wide event using public money for a private... 4139 Mar 2016 #6
Absolutely! pat_k Mar 2016 #10
Interesting perspective. RedCappedBandit Mar 2016 #15
That can register for whichever party they want JI7 Mar 2016 #32
No need to "register" just select which ballot ... Dem ballot, Repub ballot, Green ballot... 4139 Mar 2016 #38
On parties.... Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #13
Independents make up 43% of the electorate with Democrats 30% and Republicans 26%. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #14
If independents don't join a party XRubicon Mar 2016 #25
I feel like closed primaries generally perpetuate the two party system. RedCappedBandit Mar 2016 #16
absolutely agree +10 eom Karma13612 Mar 2016 #23
Open primaries get more voters involved in the electoral process. surrealAmerican Mar 2016 #18
If everybody's voting, why have a primary? Orangepeel Mar 2016 #20
I voted open primaries but think that one POTUS primary PufPuf23 Mar 2016 #21
No strong feeling, but closed makes more sense Renew Deal Mar 2016 #26
The 2 big political parties have an institutional monopoly on the political process. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #27
Ca has a jungle primary can you imagine the insanity MattP Mar 2016 #30
I am for absolute open primaries across the board nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #33
Closed primaries. Dem voters should decide Dem nominee. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #36
Only for Bernie in 2016. After that, they should all be closed again wyldwolf Mar 2016 #37
I really yuiyoshida Mar 2016 #39
Why do people think that they have a say in a party that they're not a member of? Yavin4 Mar 2016 #40
I know several Democrats here in Ohio who voted for Kasich to hurt Trump. pampango Mar 2016 #44
Maybe I am missing something DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #46
Open bigwillq Mar 2016 #50
Independents, who will soon be a majority of the electorate, Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #54
Carrying the "Open Primary" goal to it's logical conclusion... brooklynite Mar 2016 #55
Other! I would like to see primaries open to Unaffiliated and Republican voters. femmedem Mar 2016 #57
I support "semi-closed"/"semi-opem" primaries. liberalnarb Mar 2016 #59
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Open primaries?»Reply #55