2016 Postmortem

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)

20. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:05 PM

Mar 2016

The author's bio (in his OWN words)

I have no background in investigative journalism or law. I have not gone to law school, journalism school, or ever worked for a newspaper, magazine or any other publication. That’s why you may see scattered typos, grammar mistakes and incorrect legal phrasing. I tried to write this as deeply and as quickly as possible before I thought this story would be told by someone else. Please send proof-reads my way if you notice any, I am still going back and correcting mistakes here and there.

I have written only two other lengthy works.

My Economics thesis which analyzed the merger between two biotech companies – Thermo Fisher Scientific and Life Technologies.

And a class report for the Center for International Trade and Security – surrounding the United Nation’s decision to militarily intervene in Libya, but not Syria, during the Arab Spring.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you think Hillary will be indicted? [View all] TacoD Mar 2016 OP

This should be a good gauge of just how misinformed DU posters are ... nt salinsky Mar 2016 #1

Some are misinformed and some just want to see Hillary suffer. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #29

She will not be and should not be. morningfog Mar 2016 #2

This. Agschmid Mar 2016 #5

If she should not be TeddyR Mar 2016 #50

There are a variety of laws that could have been broken. morningfog Mar 2016 #56

I doubt it, but I don't know if she should be or not. ZombieHorde Mar 2016 #3

I'd like to see the results of the FBI investigation B2G Mar 2016 #4

For what? zappaman Mar 2016 #6

for being Hillary Clinton. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #15

Three possibilities: indicted, unindicted co-conspirator, unindicted Impedimentus Mar 2016 #7

rule of law vs executive exceptionalism reddread Mar 2016 #8

For the email crap? No. Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2016 #9

If they'd just investigate the apparent sale of access while SOS senz Mar 2016 #38

To me, THAT is where the real story is -- Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2016 #48

I agree, this transcends party and goes to the heart of democratic governance. senz Mar 2016 #52

Accusation is proof. creon Mar 2016 #10

Recommended by FBI for indictment; not indicted by Obama DoJ. Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #11

Virtually no difference between Bernie Sanders supporters geek tragedy Mar 2016 #12

It will also be a good PPR list for Skinner n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #14

Push polling of a non-issue -- devious cosmicone Mar 2016 #13

it's a public service, this poll helps identify geek tragedy Mar 2016 #17

+1 ... very true. n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #18

the next step will be them accusing Lynch and Obama of official corruption for covering it up. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #21

Sadly it's true. Dem2 Mar 2016 #32

In what way is this a push poll? I tried very hard to word it fairly (nt) TacoD Mar 2016 #22

It is quite simple cosmicone Mar 2016 #24

In your example, TacoD Mar 2016 #25

I think your poll is very well worded and provides a useful service to the community geek tragedy Mar 2016 #27

Thanks :-) nt TacoD Mar 2016 #30

Just because the whole echo chamber is claiming something cosmicone Mar 2016 #46

I just posted this.... blueintelligentsia Mar 2016 #16

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaha cosmicone Mar 2016 #20

You're digging deep for this one. WhiteTara Mar 2016 #43

Since I'm not an FBI agent or the Attorney General, Vinca Mar 2016 #19

Democrats don't seem to care about Clinton's email server issue geek tragedy Mar 2016 #23

No idea and won't speculate. riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #26

Wealthy powerful bad guys always "get away with murder." senz Mar 2016 #28

This is an illuminating poll. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #31

Illuminating enough to open any eyes? senz Mar 2016 #45

A lot of law and order Bernie supporters apparently Onlooker Mar 2016 #33

I don't see a single Bernie supporter voting that Clinton shouldn't be indicted geek tragedy Mar 2016 #34

Reply #2? (nt) TacoD Mar 2016 #36

You're right, there's one! nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #40

Partial explanation for why we're not Clinton supporters. senz Mar 2016 #42

That is their last hope out of desperation. cosmicone Mar 2016 #47

thank goodness for closed primaries to prevent such people from sabotaging us nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #49

Hear hear!! n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #53

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2016 #57

I doubt that she'll be indicted. Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #35

Powerful Clinton people don't get in trouble when they commit crimes jfern Mar 2016 #37

so you've concluded she's a criminal. Outstanding! geek tragedy Mar 2016 #41

I haven't got a clue whether she'll be indicted or not. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #39

Probably not bigwillq Mar 2016 #44

Of course not. Oligarchies don't work that way. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #51

Of course not. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #54

Does it make any difference? tularetom Mar 2016 #55