Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, Let's follow the money... Actual inbred oil (Koch/BP) relationships, like Hillary's Podesta. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #1
Thanks for the facts. btw..It's Greenpeace and Huffington Post pointing up her big oil money connect EndElectoral Apr 2016 #3
Mother Jones was writing about her connections before even them Dragonfli Apr 2016 #11
Follow the money always. She has a super pac MaeScott Apr 2016 #4
The Koch brothers have spent more money on the Sanders campaign than the Clinton campaign. George II Apr 2016 #12
Not because they support him, only stupid people think that, but to undermine HRC as inevitable. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #17
So, she's in the pocket of the Koch Brothers and their allies, but they want to undermine her. George II Apr 2016 #21
It would to you. But, to undermine both so that a GOPer gets elected. But, you know that. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #24
+1 dchill Apr 2016 #54
Sadly.. they are EXACTLY the positions of someone who has been bought. basselope Apr 2016 #2
How so? George II Apr 2016 #13
Because they are nonsense. basselope Apr 2016 #15
So you can't be specific. Good to know. Thanks! George II Apr 2016 #20
I was very specific. basselope Apr 2016 #26
Back to my first question - how so? George II Apr 2016 #33
Because none of these votes have any REAL impact. basselope Apr 2016 #36
Well then, Clinton could punt back to the typical Sanders "excuse" for a bad vote: George II Apr 2016 #39
LOL. basselope Apr 2016 #50
For man years my Dad repaired the diesel engines DURHAM D Apr 2016 #5
Did your Dad wear expensive suits and rake in big bucks to buy politicians? Armstead Apr 2016 #6
A sister and brother of mine were bank tellers (barely minimum wage workers) and..... George II Apr 2016 #14
putting words in Bernie's mouth. Perogie Apr 2016 #30
Well, since Sanders claims that the contributors to Clinton's campaign are...... George II Apr 2016 #35
wow, you really don't know much Perogie Apr 2016 #51
Okay, if I really don't know much, where does that leave you? George II Apr 2016 #52
nonsense. n/t Merryland Apr 2016 #32
she supports and encourages fracking. thats enough for me to vote against her Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #7
Excellent analysis! mcar Apr 2016 #8
Unfortunately Sanders doesn't understand the campaign finance laws. Just because someone WORKS.... George II Apr 2016 #9
Bridges for sale loyalsister Apr 2016 #45
still blaming Sanders, when those are public records Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #10
You're correct. NOT in their pocket. In their fucking undergarments. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #16
Big ole +1. nt nc4bo Apr 2016 #25
Bernie has no integrity left. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #18
No, no-- she lives in Wall Street's pocket. She only vacations in Big Oil's pocket. Marr Apr 2016 #19
Yep, Hillary is *owned* by Wall Street, Big Oil only has a long term sublease Fumesucker Apr 2016 #22
The vast majority of Hillary bashing is RW rumor... Sancho Apr 2016 #23
"I think a lot..." I'm doubting that. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #27
...you protest too much... Sancho Apr 2016 #34
That's some paranoia of the First Fucking Degree. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #40
Would you prefer the charge of the Bernie Brigade? Sancho Apr 2016 #70
This is a clever bullshit response from Clinton campaign. highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #28
Some things end up "true" due to repetition treestar Apr 2016 #29
She's in everybody else's pocket - of course she's in theirs. n/t Merryland Apr 2016 #31
Bernie never actually said that. Just like he never had a meltdown. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #37
Don't trust Maddow. H has shown some support for fracking & Keystone. C'mon you guys. snowy owl Apr 2016 #38
The Washington Post ruled the claim three Pinocchios BainsBane Apr 2016 #41
Yes, Three out of four Pinocchios, which means "Significant factual errors and/or obvious lunamagica Apr 2016 #46
Excellent post, lunamagica. brer cat Apr 2016 #42
Thanks! When I saw it, I just had to bring it here lunamagica Apr 2016 #47
thank you for the post lunamagica! DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #43
Thanks! lunamagica Apr 2016 #48
Someone has a very long nose and it isn't Hillary leftofcool Apr 2016 #44
Three Pinocchios long! lunamagica Apr 2016 #55
Great post with great facts Gothmog Apr 2016 #49
Thanks for all the pesky facts!!!! LAS14 Apr 2016 #53
Nothing worse than pesky facts getting in the way of a good lie! lunamagica Apr 2016 #56
Wall Street is her real owner. I'll give azmom Apr 2016 #57
Bernie's internals must not be good. His desperation has caused him to step up his lying. redstateblues Apr 2016 #58
You are quite mistaken. You also should not accuse azmom Apr 2016 #60
I'm still waiting for proof of quid pro quo. redstateblues Apr 2016 #66
Is this what you are looking for: azmom Apr 2016 #68
You don't get bigger "Big Oil" than Saudi Arabia AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #59
They are big donors to the Clinton slush fund. azmom Apr 2016 #61
TY! Lucinda Apr 2016 #62
Yeah, all that fracking talk was just a bunch of methane... poof and its gone... only it smells like Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #63
So what's this then?? SHRED Apr 2016 #64
Why have Senators and Representitive vote on stuff that'll actually make a difference? baldguy Apr 2016 #65
Oh, please. grntuscarora Apr 2016 #67
Yeah sure... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #69
Sanders wants an apology for being caught in a lie Gothmog Apr 2016 #71
Rachel "Hillary may I kiss your ring" Maddow is quite clever. Avalux Apr 2016 #72
Big K and R oasis Apr 2016 #73
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie's Claim That HILLA...»Reply #16