Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
18. your source is an automatic debunk
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 06:24 PM
Apr 2016

I give you permission to post it again when any other news source picks it up, k?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sniper fire? RobertEarl Apr 2016 #1
Really? That's your go-to eh? Lucinda Apr 2016 #9
Heh. RobertEarl Apr 2016 #11
Dude can't even keep up with campaign donations when there is software that does it Lucinda Apr 2016 #13
It's not all good RobertEarl Apr 2016 #20
Oh yeah, POTUS is responsible for financing and managing computer functions, big part of job. highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #26
If he cant manage to hire people that can run software, I don't think I want him in charge Lucinda Apr 2016 #27
reported correctly on all other forms. explained days ago Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #2
Where's the answer then? Has this FEC letter been debunked? pnwmom Apr 2016 #3
response due date: may 4 right there in your post Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #4
There's zero reputable sources for this. Just Hillary’s 2 propaganda sites nt riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #6
I just checked Snopes and it's not listed there. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #19
Response due date. So? How can it have been debunked if he hasn't responded? pnwmom Apr 2016 #15
Why do you even think its true? It exists nowhere else but on propaganda sites nt riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #17
I checked Snopes and it's not listed there. nt pnwmom Apr 2016 #21
I'd answer that means its so whacky its not even on the radar riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #23
The earlier FEC documents that were put on PV were also covered by USA today. pnwmom Apr 2016 #24
Then link that and I'll look at it. riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #25
Here. pnwmom Apr 2016 #28
That's not the same issue at all from your OP riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #29
you might want to take down the OP grasswire Apr 2016 #5
let it stay Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #8
You didn't debunk this from me two days ago. If there's an answer, what's stopping you pnwmom Apr 2016 #14
your source is an automatic debunk Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #18
Why not just answer with a link? Is this a true FEC letter? If Bernie's campaign pnwmom Apr 2016 #12
There's no response and no record of it other than these 2 propaganda sites riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #16
The podium bird told him he could do it !!! /sarcasm uponit7771 Apr 2016 #7
It is a good question. Lucinda Apr 2016 #10
Eh, 6 of one... Dem2 Apr 2016 #22
More nonsense. Just part of Hillarys' dishonest mud slinging campaign. Ignore. imagine2015 Apr 2016 #30
His campaign has gotten two other letters from the same FEC person. pnwmom Apr 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So what's the deal with t...»Reply #18