2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: At the risk of being alerted, banned, .... [View all]Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)And with glitter thrown in for good measure - probably because Clinton is so "gay-friendly" these days. Praise Nancy for the glitter accusation. I am sure I deserved it.
And that entitled whine: I voted for Obama in 2008 so now everybody must vote for Clinton in 2016. It's "HER TURN" by another name.
You fail to realise that Obama EARNED and DESERVED those votes. Clinton spent the last months telling us "I don't want you I don't need you I don't care about you, you racist sexist hell-bound sluts lusting for keyboard-warring Berniebros, complacent and duped millennial pony-wanters and uncorn-riders. Oh and by the way the Reagans started the national conversation they tried to deadpan, just as I tried to deadpan you marriages until 2013."
Tell me how any of that has earned my vote, deserves my vote, or better yet: telkl me how someone so callously disregarding my most fundamental rights is somehow entitled to ANY of my support. Tell me why someone like that even deserves to be nominated, when 57% of the voters thoroughly distrust her. Surely we have better candidates to field?