Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

awake

(3,226 posts)

4. If she has broken the law then yes

Reply to MadBadger (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 02:36 PM

May 2016

If not then no. It is like if you were asking if you think some one should stop beating their wife with out knowing if there was any beating going on.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you WANT Hillary Clinton to be indicted? [View all] MadBadger May 2016 OP

I do. If there are valid reasons for the indictment. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #1

Only if valid, but if it's going to happen, then PLEASE before we're stuck with her lagomorph777 May 2016 #16

^^ This. n/t winter is coming May 2016 #24

Yep. nt silvershadow May 2016 #32

Agreed. GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #20

Only if there are legitimate grounds. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #2

The email-gasms echo the misinterpretation of OWS. randome May 2016 #3

If she has broken the law then yes awake May 2016 #4

I voted no. I am against innocent people going to jail. aaaaaa5a May 2016 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #6

There seems to be a lot of this lately. senz May 2016 #12

No. metroins May 2016 #7

I want her to be held to the same standard any regular citizen would be judged by. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #8

I just want a resolution cali May 2016 #9

Gotta keep those private prison beds full somehow. nt Live and Learn May 2016 #10

That would be going above and beyond the call of duty. senz May 2016 #14

Only if she should be bigwillq May 2016 #11

Only if I would be indicted if I ran a state department email server out of my garage Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #13

You or I would have already senz May 2016 #19

I just want the truth. And to either have her name cleared or jillan May 2016 #15

If the FBI recommends it, yes. If not, no. IdaBriggs May 2016 #17

What I want is for there to be a decision Blue_In_AK May 2016 #18

If she committed a crime, yes Matariki May 2016 #21

yes Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #22

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #23

No. alice mauna May 2016 #25

What? bvf May 2016 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #37

Where to start? bvf May 2016 #38

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #39

Absolutely AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #26

I want her to be treated as anyone else would be treated, and I would like the conclusive results to highprincipleswork May 2016 #27

over her real crimes, yes but not over stupid e-mails. Its a distraction to deflect away from the larkrake May 2016 #28

I want her to go away, that's what I want. BlueStater May 2016 #30

no, absolutely not renate May 2016 #31

Of course Bernie supporters do. It's all they have. auntpurl May 2016 #33

I want her investigated thoroughly. If she directly harmed USA, she should be indicted. Hoyt May 2016 #34

Let the FBI investigation play out Duckhunter935 May 2016 #35

A few high ranking officials formerly in the intelligence community pdsimdars May 2016 #43

If she broke the law -- yes. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #36

If she has committed a criminal act, damn straight. Hell Hath No Fury May 2016 #40

I view indictment as a victory for Trump jzodda May 2016 #41

If you look into it, it is unfathomable how she did what she did. pdsimdars May 2016 #42