Last edited Thu May 12, 2016, 12:58 PM - Edit history (1)
in the Democratic party for the good of the party and one would assume nation.
That is why the system was devised.
The super-delegates were never meant to be proportional but to embody collected wisdom.
I became more aware of their role in POTUS 2016.
The Democratic establishment and DNC made a mistake in treating Hillary Clinton as an incumbent and presumptive nominee and having so many super-delegates commit to Clinton prior to Sanders and other Democrats joining the competition form POTUS nominee. This was a grave error and the super-delegate system is for such errors.
I backed into Sanders who has my vote in the California primary but there are a number of Democrats preferable to Hillary Clinton and I would gladly accept a candidate other than the two still competing at a brokered convention.
Sanders is refreshing and appears to support New Deal / Great Society rather than neo-liberal and neo-conservative policies so is my favorite now.
I am all for a reduction of war and empire and corporatism and for social justice and Keynesian economics.
Hillary Clinton does not have the character to be CIC nor POTUS. I believed that strongly in 2008 and ever more so now.
My opinion may not be a majority view but is a substantial and popular opinion.
This clip is all one needs to see regards Clinton's character: