Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

PJMcK

(25,052 posts)

26. Don't entirely agree

Reply to still_one (Reply #7)

Fri May 20, 2016, 12:06 PM

May 2016

While it's true that many news outlets favor the Republicans such as Fox News, Breitbart and The Drudge Report. But there are many reputable news sites that represent the conservative point of view. Two examples are The National Review and The Wall Street Journal. In no way am I endorsing the right wing's point of view but it's possible to trap yourself in a left-wing bubble if you don't read a broad range of perspectives.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fox news had Clinton winning Penn by only 2 pts [View all] DLCWIdem May 2016 OP

we are quoting faux snooze now? really????? niyad May 2016 #1

I think the OP is trying to counter the posts going around quoting a Fox still_one May 2016 #4

that is possible. I am astounded at all the faux snooze threads on this site. niyad May 2016 #5

That bothers me also, and it isn't just faux threads, it is a fair number of links still_one May 2016 #7

I know, and it is getting steadily worse. niyad May 2016 #8

Don't entirely agree PJMcK May 2016 #26

Faux Poll BlueNoMatterWho May 2016 #2

Even if correct, she only needs about 40% to still win in delegates. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #3

Hillary winning 55 to 43in Penn, is a pretty off poll. The National Poll from fox still_one May 2016 #6

Your not getting me. Every single poll had the same number. I thought it was a typo. DLCWIdem May 2016 #9

All Their sampling was obviously screwed up. And no, I didn't get your original still_one May 2016 #10

I thought screwed up on purpose. DLCWIdem May 2016 #11

I don't know still_one May 2016 #12

What are you talking about? Fox had her up 11 in PA ram2008 May 2016 #13

No. When I looked it on the 538 just days before the primary the poll said Clinton +2 DLCWIdem May 2016 #14

Well, you must've imagined it, because no such poll exists n/t ram2008 May 2016 #15

the poll your quoting was from April 10. the one I saw was around April 18. byline was Sanders sur DLCWIdem May 2016 #16

Your eyes must've deceived you. There was no such poll. ram2008 May 2016 #17

quick look right now DLCWIdem May 2016 #18

Your first link doesn't show PA, which is what we're talking about, second link is broken. ram2008 May 2016 #19

again thats California which is still up. Look on the Ca 538 site. PA and MD were already dropped DLCWIdem May 2016 #20

California has not yet voted, so the accuracy or inaccuracy of the polls there cannot be measured ram2008 May 2016 #21

As compared to the other polls. DLCWIdem May 2016 #23

the top pol is 10. Fox poll 2. bottom poll 12. Quite a difference 10-------2--------12 DLCWIdem May 2016 #24

Actually my post was about numerous Fox polls DLCWIdem May 2016 #22

You're not making any sense at all, the polls you're talking about don't exist ram2008 May 2016 #25

I just found another poll from Fox that has Clinton up +2 DLCWIdem May 2016 #27