Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Do voters in the last primaries deserve to have ANY say in who the nominee is? [View all]Buns_of_Fire
(17,947 posts)42. Of course. So long as they vote for the Debbie-Approved candidate.
For the rest, I support immediate loss of citizenship and deportation, with their assets being divided between the Clinton Foundation (75%) and the True Believers (5%). (The remaining 20% will be retained by the DNC for administrative overhead and processing charges.)
I know it seems a little harsh, but that's what Bill suggested when we talked a few minutes ago.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do voters in the last primaries deserve to have ANY say in who the nominee is? [View all]
yurbud
May 2016
OP
You are wrong. People in California have been lied to. I know this, as I was one of them. n/t
truedelphi
May 2016
#3
The DNC does not control state elections. Someone else has been lying to you.
1StrongBlackMan
May 2016
#28
In 2004, Edwards pulled out AFTER I mailed in my primary ballot voting for him and before the actual
yurbud
May 2016
#7
It would be easier for that "loser" to show class if it was not stolen out from
truedelphi
May 2016
#5
Probably because they're fiction stories. Try the Disney channel for fairytales.
procon
May 2016
#21
That "loser" stuff is really going to convince Bernie supporters to jump on Hillary's bandwagon
yurbud
May 2016
#13
Is the position that you describe as belonging to all of us Sanders' supporters
truedelphi
May 2016
#30
People on DU have said they will vote for Trump? That seems unlikely for longtime progressives
yurbud
May 2016
#37
I didn't realize anyone from the Clinton campaign or MSM had called for Sanders to drop out.
Garrett78
May 2016
#23
This disgusting trying to push it to the end without it being the end by the MSM and others
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#8
He should stay in until the delegates and superdelegates actually cast their votes at the convention
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#16
California has a 40 million population. Why does anyone think any candidate should drop out before
onecaliberal
May 2016
#27
Oh please, at least three days of the week there is an OP up about how Bernie should save
truedelphi
May 2016
#45
I see a lot of posts about how Sanders won't end up with more pledged delegates.
Garrett78
May 2016
#46
They did. Clinton won. This is amazing. Did we do this in '08 and I just ignored it?
seabeyond
May 2016
#41