Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: David Axelrod: a very awkward position to be if you`re trying to lead a political revolution [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)27. Sorry but I am not drinking whatever you are. There were a lot of manipulations that occurred in
Last edited Wed Jun 15, 2016, 11:37 AM - Edit history (1)
2000. In a close election it doesn't take much to push one way or the other. Same thing happened in 2004. And it looks like it's happening again. Now each and every case the candidate that the Powers That Be support win.
I don't know what you think of President Carter but this is what he said,
"In the context of the Carter Centres work monitoring electoral processes around the globe, Carter also disclosed his opinion that in the US we have one of the worst election processes in the world, and its almost entirely because of the excessive influx of money, he said referring to lack of controls over private campaign donations."
Now those that side with Clinton and the billionaires won't like what he has to say.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
David Axelrod: a very awkward position to be if you`re trying to lead a political revolution [View all]
question everything
Jun 2016
OP
All Bernie has now is an argument that we need to steal an election to save democracy.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#1
I can almost hear him, "In order to save Democracy, we had to burn it to the ground."
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2016
#4
Like Grover Norquist, who wants to deprive funds (taxes) from the government
question everything
Jun 2016
#32
Bernie can talk the talk, we'll know this week whether he's willing to walk the walk, i.e.
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#2
A revolution against the party elite that asks the party elite to overthrow the will of the voters..
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2016
#3
The will of the majority of the voters as defined by votes cast by voters.
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2016
#8
It is well know around the world that our election system is the worst of all modern
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#10
Yet, somehow, the will of the voters is still heard. The elites should not coronate Sanders.
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2016
#12
He is calling for the Super-Delegates to make this corrupted election right.
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#17
Bernie is "entitled"? Pure projection. The Clinton followers didn't even want a primary because
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#16
Sorry but I am not drinking whatever you are. There were a lot of manipulations that occurred in
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#27
I would say that America's elections are within the top 30% worldwide by most measures.
Donald Ian Rankin
Jun 2016
#53
3 million votes is a lie. You leave out the states that used the caucus system. But you know that.
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#29
If this is a "corrupt" election system then why are you fighting to be a part of it?
question everything
Jun 2016
#33
No, they are not. But they certainly influenced Congress and these elections
question everything
Jun 2016
#36
Another mouthpiece for Clinton has spouted a campaign talking point. And it totally false. A lie.
imagine2015
Jun 2016
#6
After referring to them as the establishment and oligarchy. You just can't make this chit up.
grossproffit
Jun 2016
#28
Lies, lies and more lies. She is not the nominee and he is a pathetic Democrat. But then
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#31
Don't expect other people to share in your silly denial. She is the nominee.
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#39
LOL. You aren't worth my time and I am not sure why I failed to put you on ignore.
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#42
We will fight on against those that have brought us 2.5 million homeless American children and
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#43
Gloat if you will but your candidate supports those that brought us the poverty
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#46
It's a revolution for democracy. We now have a corporate run oligarchy. But you embrace
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#47
It's a fairly untenable position, for sure, in a situation rife with untenable positions.
Jester Messiah
Jun 2016
#51