2016 Postmortem

John Poet

(2,510 posts)

69. Even if Bernie goes away, This will not.

Reply to Segami (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:36 AM

Jun 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Email PROBE: Intel Officials NAMED in Clinton's Email Could Be FBI's Reason For Indicting Hillary [View all] Segami Jun 2016 OP

Let's see if Hillary makes it to the convention without being charged.... Segami Jun 2016 #1

She could have just chose to stand down and NOT run nc4bo Jun 2016 #4

greedy narcissism is not simple. restorefreedom Jun 2016 #71

Don't be to harsh Skink Jun 2016 #9

Ignoring the law isn't a 'mistake'. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #33

Let's Get This Over With One Way Or The Other! CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #43

Even if Bernie goes away, This will not. John Poet Jun 2016 #69

I think they'll carry her to the convention magical thyme Jun 2016 #82

I predict eight years form now. RandySF Jun 2016 #2

Sure, we still talk about Watergate too. n/t dragonfly301 Jun 2016 #31

June 14th trumad Jun 2016 #3

You'll be leaving? 99Forever Jun 2016 #37

Anybody who posts garbage like this topic will be leaving. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #46

You be sure and tell Skinner... 99Forever Jun 2016 #48

This isn't RW garbage pinebox Jun 2016 #59

Yes it is RW garbage. The OP's link cited Breitbart, enough said Lord Magus Jun 2016 #60

I just read it here is all pinebox Jun 2016 #61

No...but right wing trolls will be gone. trumad Jun 2016 #62

I didn't know any such "right wing trolls" were allowed now. 99Forever Jun 2016 #63

LOL trumad Jun 2016 #64

So you've got nothing. 99Forever Jun 2016 #65

Tell you what trumad Jun 2016 #66

You won't tell me anything. 99Forever Jun 2016 #67

OK---so let's get this straight--- trumad Jun 2016 #70

And yet you still aren't talking about anything of substance related to the article. think Jun 2016 #72

Substance? trumad Jun 2016 #75

Ya, Hillary breaking rules that may have lead to intel names being compromised is Hillarious! think Jun 2016 #85

So you still have nothing. 99Forever Jun 2016 #74

And what do you have? trumad Jun 2016 #76

I have the courage of my convictions. 99Forever Jun 2016 #80

And there it lies.... trumad Jun 2016 #83

Then we should be back to the 15 hrc supporters.we.started with soon. SwampG8r Jun 2016 #79

Do you think that intel officials were named in the Hillary emails? think Jun 2016 #41

Another lame post from the Hillarian crowd.... Segami Jun 2016 #73

A lot of the redactions cite b(3) both in the email addresses and Press Virginia Jun 2016 #5

And the Plame case went where...? Jitter65 Jun 2016 #6

Actual operations don't need to be compromised for someone to be charged Press Virginia Jun 2016 #8

Considering anything that would possibly prove that would be either redacted or withheld. NWCorona Jun 2016 #10

"...The State Department produced a document.. Segami Jun 2016 #20

Yup I'm familiar with those codes. It's not looking to good for Hillary. NWCorona Jun 2016 #21

A pity Skinner didn't implement the ban on right-wing sources effective immediately. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #44

This is just getting so sad now. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #7

It really is. kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #15

You must be awfully young and have a short frame of reference leveymg Jun 2016 #16

Your condescension is noted! hrmjustin Jun 2016 #19

What is "this is getting so sad now" if not condescension? leveymg Jun 2016 #22

Oh I comprehend! I comprehend plenty going on in this moment. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #23

So explain to us how she is going to be exonerated? leveymg Jun 2016 #25

No I don't worry about it. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #28

Only the FBI knows where this is going emulatorloo Jun 2016 #29

.. And (at least) the NSA... n/t Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #32

I don't think they're leaking either? emulatorloo Jun 2016 #51

The Inquisitr is not credible WhiteTara Jun 2016 #56

Very sleazy source; ProgressiveEconomist Jun 2016 #11

why not throw in Julius and Ethel Rosenberg Protalker Jun 2016 #12

I'm posting pointless OPs at DU! onehandle Jun 2016 #13

No, I'm posting pointless OPs at DU! onehandle Jun 2016 #14

Grow up and stop your immature, meaningless double posts. Segami Jun 2016 #17

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #18

how kind of you to kick it, then! nt grasswire Jun 2016 #27

Yes, we've all seen your Apple OPs. DesMoinesDem Jun 2016 #39

It is interesting that State is worried about sharing information jwirr Jun 2016 #24

The president has automatic clearance for everything by virtue of being the president. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #45

Personally I think this election shows us exactly how insecure jwirr Jun 2016 #58

there is plenty else to indict her for, as well. nt grasswire Jun 2016 #26

Okay, so I haven't been to law school - but I've watched lawyers on TV dflprincess Jun 2016 #30

Generally, article writers aren't attorneys. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #34

While it's my opinion that "Brietbart News" is an oxymoron, it's also my opinion .... Scuba Jun 2016 #35

When you watch Gilligan's Island do you think that this mythology Jun 2016 #36

I like logic justiceischeap Jun 2016 #38

Either it's black or it's white? Wednesdays Jun 2016 #40

Why then, does Bill Clinton no longer have a license to practice law? loyalsister Jun 2016 #50

I'm still waiting for the 'logic' part... Maedhros Jun 2016 #78

I think this has been pointed out to you before, but it bears repeating: the FBI doesn't indict onenote Jun 2016 #42

They do recommend though, and a recommendation for indictment by the FBI would be NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #49

They don't even recommend indictments. They present their findings to the prosecutors, who make.... George II Jun 2016 #53

They do make recommendations. KULawHawk Jun 2016 #55

It just never ends...... George II Jun 2016 #47

In Bernie and Trump world itsrobert Jun 2016 #52

The use of shouty all CAPS! rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #54

Kickin' for the truth! Faux pas Jun 2016 #57

Maybe. Seems we have seen this happen before and nothing much came of it. GreenPartyVoter Jun 2016 #68

If anyone is indicted, it won't be Hillary. Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #77

"According to Brietbart News,..." Alrighty then, that settles it! Guilty! yellowcanine Jun 2016 #81

Keep hoping....... Beacool Jun 2016 #84