Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)56. Hear, here,,,,,,,,
not only this but we need to insure that only registered Democrats can run as our candidates.......!
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Absolutely agree...and hopefully the DNC is paying close attention to what happens
eastwestdem
Jul 2016
#5
Exactly. All this talk about revising the process. F*ck that. They need to lock this s*it down.
timlot
Jul 2016
#6
I didn't think a person could be a delegate unless they were registered as a Democrat?
still_one
Jul 2016
#7
I think they should be a registered Democrat for at least 2 years before they're
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#9
teenage delegates are a cute genre of story for convention time but not really
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#13
Lots of States have no Party registration at all. We have a closed and clean Primary which
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#14
New York does something like that I believe, though I think it is based on the last election
still_one
Jul 2016
#32
have it be a condition to vote in a primary that you will vote for that party's nominee
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#15
I think it's illegal to tell people that their right to vote hinges on some other agreement.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#20
Party registration is different from loyalty oaths, pledges and poll tests.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#23
NY beat out Texas and Mississipppi for turnout this year, still very low....
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2016
#34
If parties want to make their own rules for primaries, fine-if they pay the costs of their primaries
merrily
Jul 2016
#29
With close to 50% of registered voters feeling their party no longer represent them,
B Calm
Jul 2016
#47
Point taken. "However, in states where the party may struggle, such as Texas, Indiana,
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#54
I couldn't agree more. If I was against open primaries (and Caucuses) before, today's events have
lunamagica
Jul 2016
#53
Voter oppression? Democratic value? That many Greens, party'd be doing better. And Martin O'Malley?
George Eliot
Jul 2016
#62
It's hard to know what would have been "best" without knowing the outcome.
thesquanderer
Jul 2016
#70
then they need to restrict delegate privileges to people who've been in the party
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#73
I can't stand caucuses. I have a funny feeling I'm going to run the next one....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2016
#84