Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Obama abuses the constitution is just pure BS .. [View all]Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)24. I need names
and I need evidence they "know what they are talking about".
Also, WHY should we believe an intelligence service that has a 50+ year string of failures? A 50+ year record of willfully violating the law?
When it comes to whether or not we commit murder as a national policy, I have MUCH higher standards of proof.
I don't think "everyone is lying", I think that MANY in government have lied often enough that we must require much more than just their word before we believe them.
As far as I am aware, no credible source has disputed that Al Waki was sending bombs. Under the circumstances, Obama did the right thing.
Seriously, that is now the standard of proof? Last I checked, the U.S. criminal code REQUIRED the presumption of innocence and that the state must PROVE guilt. You are telling me it is sufficient that the state make an allegation, and unless some "credible source" disagrees with them, the allegation is assumed true and their life is forfeit.
In terms of logic, that is right up there with "He must be guilty, otherwise he wouldn't have been arrested."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps these are hits to prevent little girls dressed in pink from a terrorist plot,
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#16
So far you have not said anything to change my opinion, but I will continue to have my opinion.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#21
I do not have the information which is given to those in charge of making these
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#25
So, you choose to believe that people who have lied in the past are now telling the truth?
Kelvin Mace
Jun 2014
#26
Who are you complaining about, I did not know this is a thread about the CIA.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#33
Since you do not know if they were sight seeing then you don't know if they are aidinf abetting
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#11
According to Obama administration folks who know what they are talking about.
SunSeeker
Jun 2014
#23
If you really read Scahill's book, you'd know the son wasn't killed while looking for his dad.
SunSeeker
Jun 2014
#35
These days, having the "ideals of Republicans" does not require much "turning."
SunSeeker
Jun 2014
#40
The US does not purposely target innocent civilians. That is what Al Waki did.
SunSeeker
Jun 2014
#41