Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Insisting That Racism Be Addressed In It's Own Terms Is Not "Weaponizing" It. [View all]But the distinction is not a sharp as it is often portrayed as. And it is not like Clinton is some single-minded pusher of racial justice,
And with any candidate, there are going to be people who believe more emphasis should be placed on specific issues than others. That's just goes with the territory. (Look at the GOP and their wrangling over how to deal with or ignore immigration, for example.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Insisting That Racism Be Addressed In It's Own Terms Is Not "Weaponizing" It. [View all]
KittyWampus
Aug 2015
OP
Prepare yourself for snark. But your outline demonstrates why Bernie will never win the nomination.
leftofcool
Aug 2015
#3
But what Hillary has or rather hasn't done is plenty according to her supporters.
beam me up scottie
Aug 2015
#38
You want the staunchest Hillaryites to READ it ?!??!! Now you've gone too far
LondonReign2
Aug 2015
#18
Watch it. I got a hide today for telling somebody to stop lying. This treads dangerously close!
Ed Suspicious
Aug 2015
#77
I support your cause, but I'm only three hides away from a vacation for joining it.
Ed Suspicious
Aug 2015
#80
There is another choice, we all make a point of NOT POSTING on any of the bullshit
nadinbrzezinski
Aug 2015
#82
Unless he had a brush in his hand, I don't think literally means what you think it means.
aikoaiko
Aug 2015
#24
So since your first point is absolutely false, need we bother reading to the end of the OP?
LondonReign2
Aug 2015
#20
No, it's not that sharp, and no Hillary isn't a single-minded pusher of racial justice.
DanTex
Aug 2015
#49
I don't believe you actually know what Bernie's focus is. As something of a Bernie Fanboy, I can
Ed Suspicious
Aug 2015
#79
Not all Hispanics are Caucasian. Some are African in origin, some are mixed and some are white.
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#35
Well ... Hispanics largely term disparate treatment based on their enthicity as racism ...
1StrongBlackMan
Aug 2015
#37
I hate to point out the OP's views of LGBT activists seeking equality, but I will for you:
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2015
#50
Well, the OP has a long, strong history of that nature. What she says there is the opposite of
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2015
#61
People of color don't seem to think so. And they are who matters in this context. Nt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#67
There is an overwhelming amount of support for Hillary vs Sanders among POC. In case you didnt
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#74
like Armstead said upthread, this post is yet another example of that "weaponization"
m-lekktor
Aug 2015
#57
This is nothing new. The old "CALLING something racist is worse than actually BEING racist" BS has
Number23
Aug 2015
#65
And "weaponizing" is the new way of saying playing a "race card" which got too
bettyellen
Aug 2015
#66
Exactly. Look at the folks applauding that OP. Were any of them a surprise to you?
Number23
Aug 2015
#68
You got nothing on Bernie's policies, so you have to make shit up. Thanks for tipping your hand
GoneFishin
Aug 2015
#83