Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)

9. Your assumption is based on a false premise.

Reply to rogerashton (Original post)

Sun Sep 27, 2015, 08:04 AM

Sep 2015

Just because government servers are not completely secure it does not mean that Hillary's server was more secure. It is very possible (and likely) that although government email servers can be hacked, hers could be hacked even more easily.

You claim that the server was not known to exist. But if the government server was hacked, then the hacker would have the address and it would then be known to exist to the hacker. As you already know, judging by your response top post #1, this did actually happen through Blumenthal's AOL account. It could easily have also happened through a government server, assuming one with her address was hacked.

I'm very sorry but your argument simply makes no sense at all.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Snowden hasn't leaked anything from Hillary's email server. [View all] rogerashton Sep 2015 OP

What about the Romanian hacker "Guccifer"? CJCRANE Sep 2015 #1

OK, I have learned something. rogerashton Sep 2015 #6

AOL accounts have always been vulnerable. leftofcool Sep 2015 #11

That's correct, it wasn't her server that was hacked, it was on the other end. It wouldn't have DanTex Sep 2015 #13

She'd need to post everything on Sharepoint for Genius-Boy to take it. randome Sep 2015 #2

The msm would rather sensationalize any crumb to the made-up story. It sells riversedge Sep 2015 #3

RW smear or a fact that the head of NSA said RiverLover Sep 2015 #4

But tech and forensics found no evidence of hacking or wiping. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #10

Actually, that isn't true. jeff47 Sep 2015 #20

Very true, Roger. Plus, another security problem with the government Hortensis Sep 2015 #5

And the State Dept servers are under constant attack. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #7

The problem, as has been stated time again, Le Taz Hot Sep 2015 #8

+1000 nt restorefreedom Sep 2015 #15

Your assumption is based on a false premise. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #9

"I'm very sorry," Motown_Johnny, but rogerashton Sep 2015 #14

What evidence was presented in your OP? Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #16

1) is false. jeff47 Sep 2015 #22

With respect to the primary campaign, it's now gone beyond emails and the server HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #12

It would be hypocritical of anyone who supported Eddie treestar Sep 2015 #17

Wait, what? ljm2002 Sep 2015 #18

Actually, you're completely wrong. Her server security was awful. jeff47 Sep 2015 #19

Great post, important FACTS, not rw bs. RiverLover Sep 2015 #21

It would sink like a stone. jeff47 Sep 2015 #23

Probably so. RiverLover Sep 2015 #24