Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
12. With respect to the primary campaign, it's now gone beyond emails and the server
Sun Sep 27, 2015, 08:24 AM
Sep 2015

It's gone on to reflections re the personality and character of Clinton: how those contributed to this mess, and how those have confounded its resolution.

It's gone meta' because people ask "so what's the fuss?" and the answer comes back as speculation/concern about how these events are fit in to perceptions and concerns that already existed about her and her previous unscandals.

Set aside the legal/security issues. The meta' discussion remains relevant to the primary simply because everything that impacts/reinforces public perceptions about a primary candidate is relevant to the primary.

What about the Romanian hacker "Guccifer"? CJCRANE Sep 2015 #1
OK, I have learned something. rogerashton Sep 2015 #6
AOL accounts have always been vulnerable. leftofcool Sep 2015 #11
That's correct, it wasn't her server that was hacked, it was on the other end. It wouldn't have DanTex Sep 2015 #13
She'd need to post everything on Sharepoint for Genius-Boy to take it. randome Sep 2015 #2
The msm would rather sensationalize any crumb to the made-up story. It sells riversedge Sep 2015 #3
RW smear or a fact that the head of NSA said RiverLover Sep 2015 #4
But tech and forensics found no evidence of hacking or wiping. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #10
Actually, that isn't true. jeff47 Sep 2015 #20
Very true, Roger. Plus, another security problem with the government Hortensis Sep 2015 #5
And the State Dept servers are under constant attack. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #7
The problem, as has been stated time again, Le Taz Hot Sep 2015 #8
+1000 nt restorefreedom Sep 2015 #15
Your assumption is based on a false premise. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #9
"I'm very sorry," Motown_Johnny, but rogerashton Sep 2015 #14
What evidence was presented in your OP? Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #16
1) is false. jeff47 Sep 2015 #22
With respect to the primary campaign, it's now gone beyond emails and the server HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #12
It would be hypocritical of anyone who supported Eddie treestar Sep 2015 #17
Wait, what? ljm2002 Sep 2015 #18
Actually, you're completely wrong. Her server security was awful. jeff47 Sep 2015 #19
Great post, important FACTS, not rw bs. RiverLover Sep 2015 #21
It would sink like a stone. jeff47 Sep 2015 #23
Probably so. RiverLover Sep 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Snowden hasn't leaked any...»Reply #12