Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
16. What evidence was presented in your OP?
Sun Sep 27, 2015, 11:17 AM
Sep 2015

I don't see anything other than the same speculation that I presented.

My point about the email address being obtained through government channels seems to have been misunderstood. It would make her more vulnerable since she would suffer the same vulnerabilities as any private email server (and we know plenty of them that have been hacked, if you don't believe me then try searching for "list of companies hacked in 2014&quot as well as being vulnerable because the address could also be obtained through other channels. Her husband had been using that server for years and it is entirely possible that people had been trying to hack Bill Clinton for many years also. If they had then they would have had access to her emails.

Hillary's private server is the weakest link. Any reasonable examination of the facts leads to that conclusion.


What about the Romanian hacker "Guccifer"? CJCRANE Sep 2015 #1
OK, I have learned something. rogerashton Sep 2015 #6
AOL accounts have always been vulnerable. leftofcool Sep 2015 #11
That's correct, it wasn't her server that was hacked, it was on the other end. It wouldn't have DanTex Sep 2015 #13
She'd need to post everything on Sharepoint for Genius-Boy to take it. randome Sep 2015 #2
The msm would rather sensationalize any crumb to the made-up story. It sells riversedge Sep 2015 #3
RW smear or a fact that the head of NSA said RiverLover Sep 2015 #4
But tech and forensics found no evidence of hacking or wiping. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #10
Actually, that isn't true. jeff47 Sep 2015 #20
Very true, Roger. Plus, another security problem with the government Hortensis Sep 2015 #5
And the State Dept servers are under constant attack. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #7
The problem, as has been stated time again, Le Taz Hot Sep 2015 #8
+1000 nt restorefreedom Sep 2015 #15
Your assumption is based on a false premise. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #9
"I'm very sorry," Motown_Johnny, but rogerashton Sep 2015 #14
What evidence was presented in your OP? Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #16
1) is false. jeff47 Sep 2015 #22
With respect to the primary campaign, it's now gone beyond emails and the server HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #12
It would be hypocritical of anyone who supported Eddie treestar Sep 2015 #17
Wait, what? ljm2002 Sep 2015 #18
Actually, you're completely wrong. Her server security was awful. jeff47 Sep 2015 #19
Great post, important FACTS, not rw bs. RiverLover Sep 2015 #21
It would sink like a stone. jeff47 Sep 2015 #23
Probably so. RiverLover Sep 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Snowden hasn't leaked any...»Reply #16