Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
18. Wait, what?
Sun Sep 27, 2015, 12:09 PM
Sep 2015

"anyone who supported Eddie"... oh, you mean Edward Snowden. The person who lifted the veil on the NSA snooping everyone's emails. Since when do those who support "Eddie" want everyone's emails to be transparent? We want more government activity to be transparent, yes, within reasonable operational parameters. But we, and "Eddie", want email in general to be private. We, and "Eddie", want citizens to retain their Fourth Amendment right to privacy, without being snooped by our own government for no reason.

It does seem a little weird to run one's own private email server in order to conduct state business. But as long as emails are sent in the clear between her and other people around the country and the world, then the communications are not secure, regardless of their origin. Security is only as good as the security of the weakest link in the chain of email hops, and admins on any of the hops have access to the content of the email messages anyway.

The bottom line to me, is that everyone should be using email encryption as a matter of course, and our government officials should definitely be doing that, especially ones as highly placed as the Secretary of State. Until that becomes the norm, all this hand-waving about email security is, I repeat, laughable.

What about the Romanian hacker "Guccifer"? CJCRANE Sep 2015 #1
OK, I have learned something. rogerashton Sep 2015 #6
AOL accounts have always been vulnerable. leftofcool Sep 2015 #11
That's correct, it wasn't her server that was hacked, it was on the other end. It wouldn't have DanTex Sep 2015 #13
She'd need to post everything on Sharepoint for Genius-Boy to take it. randome Sep 2015 #2
The msm would rather sensationalize any crumb to the made-up story. It sells riversedge Sep 2015 #3
RW smear or a fact that the head of NSA said RiverLover Sep 2015 #4
But tech and forensics found no evidence of hacking or wiping. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #10
Actually, that isn't true. jeff47 Sep 2015 #20
Very true, Roger. Plus, another security problem with the government Hortensis Sep 2015 #5
And the State Dept servers are under constant attack. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #7
The problem, as has been stated time again, Le Taz Hot Sep 2015 #8
+1000 nt restorefreedom Sep 2015 #15
Your assumption is based on a false premise. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #9
"I'm very sorry," Motown_Johnny, but rogerashton Sep 2015 #14
What evidence was presented in your OP? Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #16
1) is false. jeff47 Sep 2015 #22
With respect to the primary campaign, it's now gone beyond emails and the server HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #12
It would be hypocritical of anyone who supported Eddie treestar Sep 2015 #17
Wait, what? ljm2002 Sep 2015 #18
Actually, you're completely wrong. Her server security was awful. jeff47 Sep 2015 #19
Great post, important FACTS, not rw bs. RiverLover Sep 2015 #21
It would sink like a stone. jeff47 Sep 2015 #23
Probably so. RiverLover Sep 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Snowden hasn't leaked any...»Reply #18