Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,396 posts)
11. But, see, there is no way to do that.
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:10 PM
Oct 2015

Last edited Fri Oct 30, 2015, 02:56 PM - Edit history (1)

So, it won't happen. Besides, Presidents can't cut Social Security in the first place or remove the cap.

I would not favor giving you twenty bucks HassleCat Oct 2015 #1
You don't have any real points so you will make some up upaloopa Oct 2015 #14
I will ignore your smartass attitude and explain my point HassleCat Oct 2015 #33
Very charitable, like a real Dem. nt artislife Oct 2015 #83
Good on you for explaining! I see no response.. jkbRN Oct 2015 #85
!!! Phlem Oct 2015 #84
Semantical arguments, so this is what DU is reduced to.....the whole site is being made pathetic Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #88
OK Colonel. Phlem Oct 2015 #92
That seems to be happening a lot leftyladyfrommo Oct 2015 #2
What's behind it is blind hatred of Hillary Clinton. MineralMan Oct 2015 #10
There was an Obama one just lately. leftyladyfrommo Oct 2015 #39
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2015 #54
Skip back to 2008, tell me what your search produces. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #57
It's obvious and shameful, too. Wonder what horrid name will come to the fore for her? MADem Oct 2015 #81
Theodore Roosevelt Unknown Beatle Oct 2015 #96
+1,000 Scuba Oct 2015 #105
THANK YOU so much for posting this! I heard her in the debate. ViseGrip Oct 2015 #3
Extreme desperation. Seeing more an more of it. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #4
Because some people don't like the words she used, I guess. MineralMan Oct 2015 #5
Plus a million ismnotwasm Oct 2015 #6
Yes. lovemydog Oct 2015 #13
Nah, we just bothered to read ALL the words she used jeff47 Oct 2015 #20
No it's because people hear all the words she said azurnoir Oct 2015 #75
I guess because she didn't punctuate the sentence with "Death to oligarchs!" SunSeeker Oct 2015 #7
Clinton's direct quote: in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #8
But, see, there is no way to do that. MineralMan Oct 2015 #11
Sure there is. jeff47 Oct 2015 #19
Sure they can, by signing congressional bills that contain provisions to do so. n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2015 #37
Then go on to the next PARAGRAPH where she says she favors lifting the cap- KittyWampus Oct 2015 #52
Direct quote, please? frylock Oct 2015 #59
Oh, c'mon...get real. Once "the" point is made that they want to make they don't want to.... George II Oct 2015 #72
Desperate people do desperate things workinclasszero Oct 2015 #9
Because she also said, in the same explanation, "I would consider it". PoliticAverse Oct 2015 #12
How about her last sentence added to that? upaloopa Oct 2015 #18
There are things you have to be either for or against Armstead Oct 2015 #45
"I have YET to find any recommendation (raising ret. age) I would think would be suitable" 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #61
PART of Clinton's direct quote: I would NOT favor raising retirement age" Autumn Oct 2015 #15
Hillary's DIRECT QUOTE....Filled with "ifs, ands or buts" Armstead Oct 2015 #16
It's called a sales pitch bkkyosemite Oct 2015 #38
Because she didn't stop with that one sentence. jeff47 Oct 2015 #17
Exactly, this isn't that complicated. I think some are being deliberately obtuse. Broward Oct 2015 #21
No she did not say she doesn't see any she likes upaloopa Oct 2015 #23
"But I have yet to find any recommendation that I would think would be suitable." jeff47 Oct 2015 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author upaloopa Oct 2015 #32
Raising-the-Cap would hurt NONE of those people. They could retire On Time with FULL benefits. bvar22 Oct 2015 #46
And yet she couldn't even support that completely. jeff47 Oct 2015 #48
Here. I'll let Obama explain it from 2008: bvar22 Oct 2015 #51
Let's try this slowly Armstead Oct 2015 #28
she was talking about raising the cap in that paragraph-Not the retirement age. riversedge Oct 2015 #31
Wrong. jeff47 Oct 2015 #34
And you just confirmed the point of the OP, thanks: George II Oct 2015 #78
Thanks. just saw it so will leave it. riversedge Oct 2015 #82
Nope. Try reading allllllllll the way to the end of the paragraph jeff47 Oct 2015 #99
Right- she went on to say she favors raising the CAP, not retirement age. KittyWampus Oct 2015 #53
She said she wanted to LOOK at raising the cap. frylock Oct 2015 #58
She said she was open to raising the retirement age, and then moved on to "looking at" the cap. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #65
Nope. As many times as you repeat it, that won't change what she said: George II Oct 2015 #93
I would consider it. But I have yet to find any recommendation that I would think would be suitable jeff47 Oct 2015 #100
Thank you Kitty mcar Oct 2015 #22
And Another Thing.... Armstead Oct 2015 #24
She did not say any of that for SS yesterday at the town hall riversedge Oct 2015 #29
I did not see or listen to her Town Hall if it was a differernt one Armstead Oct 2015 #30
Hillary? bvar22 Oct 2015 #49
I have been hearing this very same crappola regarding Obama.....and it NEVER eventuates Sheepshank Oct 2015 #25
People with hair on fire make a difference in some cases Armstead Oct 2015 #42
Same with Social Security. bvar22 Oct 2015 #50
I think it started with the posting of the Alternet story-The headling was misleading but it you riversedge Oct 2015 #27
As long as you stopped reading before the part where she said she'd consider it. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #36
You obviously should work on your reading comprehension including the context of the story riversedge Oct 2015 #41
How is a quote different than context? Armstead Oct 2015 #43
Really. Here's the paragraph. jeff47 Oct 2015 #44
Her last sentence gives you your answer. bye now. Enough! riversedge Oct 2015 #91
as long as you consider the paragraph that came before and AFTER it... KittyWampus Oct 2015 #55
The paragraph before is about adding means testing, and after is about lifting the cap. jeff47 Oct 2015 #64
Not now but she might consider it in the future. Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #86
"favor" is a bs doublespeak term restorefreedom Oct 2015 #35
Agreed: I hate it when politicians use that word. There's no conviction behind using that word. C Moon Oct 2015 #67
but its perfect for those who want wiggle room. nt restorefreedom Oct 2015 #95
Close, but not quite. Vattel Oct 2015 #40
It's not that hard to imagine. jeff47 Oct 2015 #66
This is HUGE fbc Oct 2015 #47
You are kidding, right? 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #62
I WOULD not favor raising retirement age.. frylock Oct 2015 #56
Yep. She always leaves herself loopholes big enough to drive a truck through. CharlotteVale Oct 2015 #63
Are you sure she will not change her mind on this RoccoR5955 Oct 2015 #60
Desperation. George II Oct 2015 #68
Because DU should be called Bash Clinton or Bash Obama underground. iandhr Oct 2015 #69
Heaven forfend we discuss issues and use the past words and actions of our candidates.. frylock Oct 2015 #73
"Would" strikes me as conditional. David__77 Oct 2015 #70
Because as her lead in the polls grow her opponents will become more vitriolic... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #71
+1 stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #74
+1 JoePhilly Oct 2015 #76
Some are at the point where they are just making stuff about her. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #79
When ... JoePhilly Oct 2015 #102
Hillary is a war mongering Wall Street loving Gman Oct 2015 #77
Hillary Clinton is worried the raising the cap Eric J in MN Oct 2015 #80
I see this thread is sorely lacking in critical thinking and heavily Phlem Oct 2015 #87
Sounds pretty strong to me. Surprised anyone is questionong what she said. Hoyt Oct 2015 #89
Uhh maybe because politicians talk out their asses. Phlem Oct 2015 #94
Yes Sanders does too. He knows he has no chance to accomplish what he proposes. Hoyt Oct 2015 #97
Notice how i said "Politicians" Phlem Oct 2015 #98
Because they lie out of desperation. n/t Lil Missy Oct 2015 #90
you know this because......... Phlem Oct 2015 #101
Because.... quickesst Oct 2015 #103
Supporting your candidate is good, I guess HassleCat Oct 2015 #104
More weasel words from the Queen of Camp Weathervane. Her chumming with Pete Peterson tells ... Scuba Oct 2015 #106
Because they can't win by telling the truth. Cha Oct 2015 #107
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton's direct quote: ...»Reply #11