2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton: Regulate Wall Street and the Terrorists Win [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)calculated it starts to appear.
1. Deflects the question of why Wall Street donates so heavily to her.
2. Wraps itself in the bloody shirt of 9/11, suggesting to question it would be unpatriotic.
3. Insinuates that all of the calls for Wall Street reform are -- as you point out in the OP -- giving terrorists what they want.
4. Consciously ... or unconsciously (and which one is worse, I am not sure) draws on the raw emotions about terrorism in the wake of the Paris attacks.
5. Shows a total lack of awareness of how her own admitted poor judgment regarding our response to 9/11 via a destructive war in Iraq that actually contributed to the rise of ISIS makes her the last person on the stage who should be invoking her personal logic about 9/11.
This is not a wise or helpful approach for Ms. Clinton.