Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: HEY DWS! Mark Ruffalo Promotes PETITION Calling On DNC To Hold MORE Debates [View all]yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)29. Probably too late. If Mark was so concerned, he probably should have joined
Sanders and O'Malley back in August.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
HEY DWS! Mark Ruffalo Promotes PETITION Calling On DNC To Hold MORE Debates [View all]
Segami
Dec 2015
OP
anyone who doesn't promote the possibility of more debates in this debacle shouldn't be
roguevalley
Dec 2015
#8
Since this went instantly to Mark's resume, let me say I hope all activist minded persons
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#51
This issue epitomizes the split in the party and exposes which side the leadership of our
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#7
Wrong the whole Dem party supports the middle Class: They just are rejecting Sanders
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#11
There is no such thing as a whole Democratic Party. I know that the hubris of the Democraic Elite
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#12
And that is the typical response. "We can't fight for freedom because it's too hard so
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#54
Yikes. You actually come out and say that you support the Oligarchy. By the way, the Democratic
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#56
You don't sound like a Democrat. So at our foodbank, before we give out food we should
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#62
If the left was son concern with these things they should not have voted for Nader
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#59
How do you know where she gets her "marching" orders? I think you want it to be true.
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#63
Yes, Dem tend favor other Dem's not socialist: Sanders has not worked for the party
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#64
Calling Sen Sanders a socialist is low. He is far from a socialist but the Republicons and
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#66
The poster I was discussing this with full knows the difference but like others is trying
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#74
No such things as elite Dem's: Just hard working Dem's that don't want Sanders
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#60
Hard working for the oligarchy. They hate all progressives. Helping the People, the 99% would cost
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#61
NO, the most important thing about the Dem's is their heart and the Hard work
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#65
Her resume includes some disasterous decisions. She takes money from the wealthy.
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#68
But her "hard choices" were wrong. She failed when the chips were down. She failed to stand up
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#71
She has been there for the American people for over 30 years when chips were down
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#75
The hubris of the DLC decided to run Gore in spite of the warnings that he would
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#79
It's not about changing the race, it's about getting the Democrat's message to the public.
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2015
#32
I'm sorry, I don't think petitions work on people who have a preexisting agenda
AZ Progressive
Dec 2015
#19