Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

redqueen

(115,186 posts)
Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:35 PM Feb 2013

Does Facebook have a problem with women? [View all]

Trigger warning.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2013/feb/19/facebook-images-rape-domestic-violence?CMP=twt_gu

Does Facebook have a problem with women? The question has been around since 2011 when Eve Ensler and Ms Magazine drew attention to the social networking site's failure to remove misogynistic images that seemed to glorify rape and domestic violence.

Then the issue came back again with users taking to Twitter in recent weeks to express their anger at Facebook's refusal to remove images that tried to make a joke of rape. Two in particular were widely circulated. One showed a woman bound and gagged on a sofa and a caption that read: "It's not rape. If she really didn't want to, she'd have said something." The second showed a condom, beneath the words "Plan A"; an emergency contraceptive pill, "Plan B"; and then "Plan C", a man pushing a woman with a bloodied face down the stairs.

The site's community standards state: "Facebook does not permit hate speech, but distinguishes between serious and humorous speech." What is not clear, in spite of several high-profile campaigns and a Change.org petition that garnered more than 200,000 signatures, is how it makes that distinction. Over the past few years, women say they have been banned from the site and seen their pages removed for posting images of cupcakes iced like labia, pictures of breastfeeding mothers and photographs of women post-mastectomy.

...

When I asked if the banned cupcake images could have been removed in error by an automated image scanner, the spokesperson said it was very unlikely. So it was a human decision to ban the image of a cupcake. Just as it is a human decision to allow pages such as "Teen SLUT pics" to continue to publish images of very young-looking girls, with no evidence they gave consent for their photographs to be used.

...


It is galling that the largest social networking site is committed to removing images of feminine sexuality unless they pander to the male gaze (pornified/caricature type images and 'creepshots' type stuff is fine with facebook), but treats violence against women as if it is a joke.
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
amen! n/t librechik Feb 2013 #1
Facebook's pretty well known for being Lowest Common Denominator malthaussen Feb 2013 #2
It is far from the lowest common denominator as far as hatred of women is concerned. redqueen Feb 2013 #3
same with racist pages noiretextatique Feb 2013 #4
It makes you wonder about who is reviewing these reports redqueen Feb 2013 #5
I wonder if there's any review process at all MynameisBlarney Feb 2013 #19
Kick this to the greatest! sheshe2 Feb 2013 #6
I'm sorry, I know it's horrible... redqueen Feb 2013 #7
Why do women still use Facebook? Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #8
Since it is the most popular and arguably the most robust networking tool redqueen Feb 2013 #9
No strategic retreat huh? Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #12
Also, if we left every social media where women are treated like crap CitizenPatriot Feb 2013 #18
Same here. smirkymonkey Mar 2013 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Feb 2013 #10
The good thing about twitter is there aren't any page owners to block you... redqueen Feb 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Feb 2013 #16
Yeah. Idiocracy. redqueen Feb 2013 #17
Facebook has over ONE BILLION user accounts Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #11
Yet they were able to catch those offensive cupcakes PDQ. Thise cupcakes are clearly what they Squinch Feb 2013 #13
I guess you missed my point Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #22
Yeah, no. If you read about the vastly differebt way they deal with breastfeeding pics, mastectomy redqueen Feb 2013 #14
Why do you suppose that is? Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #21
Why would you think your three ideas are the only possibilities? redqueen Feb 2013 #24
Okay then... (cont) Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #25
Thanks for your thoughtful reply, and your nice compliments. redqueen Feb 2013 #26
Nice post (cont) Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #27
An 'it gets better' campaign aimed at young women would be a cruel lie. redqueen Feb 2013 #28
As always, something to think about n/t Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #30
FB has a problem with hate speech in general KamaAina Feb 2013 #20
DU has over a billion user accounts JustJoe Feb 2013 #23
Did you see this? ismnotwasm Feb 2013 #29
Oh yes. redqueen Feb 2013 #31
They can't be bothered to take down a rape joke gollygee Feb 2013 #32
It's a sign of the times. Breasts used for natural purpose = disgusting and obscene. redqueen Feb 2013 #33
pornified. yes. you and i are right there, lol. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #35
breast are for male entertainment, not feeding babies, dontcha know. we act surpised at this. but... seabeyond Feb 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Does Facebook have a prob...»Reply #0