Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 03:33 PM Mar 2014

"Hot Tech Hotties" meant to address sexism in tech industry [View all]

Not at all ironic that I found this article by following a link from Weird News.

The Internet has opened tech culture to ongoing discussions about the systemic sexism and harassment in the field. Women are paid less than half of what men make. Their careers are drastically shortened. They face abuse and death threats when they speak out.

In the wake of recent debates about the industry's gender issues, one fledgling mobile magazine decided that we could all use more women in tech... in their underwear.

Hot Tech Today was released March 17 on iTunes and Google Play stores, purporting to be a new “FUN!” alternative to the average run-of-the-mill startup magazines. You know, the ones without women dropping their thong underwear on the covers.
. . .

The Facebook page is semi-regularly refreshed with new Hot Tech Hotties:



“These women are models,” argued Kelley. “They want to be models, this is the career they have chosen and hope to excel and earn a living doing what they do. We actually give them the avenue to do that. We pay them for the job they love doing and that's that. Erica Williams is really the only woman in tech within our very small organization. All of the other women in tech should be proud to have a woman owner of a tech company and really overlooking any sexism altogether.

http://www.dailydot.com/technology/hot-tech-today/?headline=9&utm_content=Tech%27s%20first%20pinup%20magazine%20brings%20the%20wrong%20kind%20of%20exposure%20to%20women&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=outbrain&utm_name=outbrain
%20default&utm_source=00300&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=default



28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
stick a finger in the mouth. how stupid. lol. just looks so stupid. damn.... seabeyond Mar 2014 #1
I'd love it BainsBane Mar 2014 #2
santa fe. that would be so cool. we have like four women in colorado we have not met up seabeyond Mar 2014 #3
Not Dallas BainsBane Mar 2014 #4
there is something there baines, lol. thinking of a couple duers. but i can do austin for sure. seabeyond Mar 2014 #5
thinking to be had. couple months though. i have to earn some money. nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #6
Sure, or even Minneapolis! BainsBane Mar 2014 #7
ya know.... i am sayin'. free free free i tell you to make our choices. who knows. lol. nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #8
meet up in florida. trumad just said he is buying, lol. nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #9
Buying what? BainsBane Mar 2014 #10
lol. i was thinkin drinks... and was a joke. couldnt pay me to meet up in florida. nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #11
chicago mopinko Mar 2014 #15
Is that your stomping ground? BainsBane Apr 2014 #21
home mopinko Apr 2014 #24
Chicago works for me BainsBane Apr 2014 #25
Sure they chose to do it. Doesn't mean the whole thing isn't stupid. n/t nomorenomore08 Mar 2014 #12
Yeah ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #13
No, it doesn't BainsBane Mar 2014 #14
+1 ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #16
Yeah, pose like a porn star once Warpy Apr 2014 #26
one. hands down. are these techie dudes? lol nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #17
Naw ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #18
hm. but then the cross in the background kinda ruins it... seabeyond Mar 2014 #19
Yeah, that's what I said ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #20
Speaking of movies BainsBane Apr 2014 #22
Ugh ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #23
had my hopes up Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #28
It would have been better had Bullock's character known what she was doing Warpy Apr 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»"Hot Tech Hotties&qu...»Reply #0