Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I've not heard it used yet... FarPoint Jun 2014 #1
It's in the thread about the billionaire who molested his 12 year old stepdaughter. redqueen Jun 2014 #2
Thank you for the reference... FarPoint Jun 2014 #4
thank you. I did not understand the context of the OP. I must say that I never Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #16
I have never understood it's purpose... giftedgirl77 Jun 2014 #3
I'm sick of it. TheBlackAdder Jun 2014 #5
it wasn't before? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #12
I think you're talking past each other, unless you're being sarcastic. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #48
of course it is not becoming non gender specific. a man still gets a pat for "getting" it. a woman seabeyond Jun 2014 #50
I was referring spiecifically to his post about Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #52
that's just plain bullshit....Men have never been shamed for being sexual and enjoying sex.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #55
Ok, I'm out of here. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #62
different posters. but ya. i hear what he was meaning. we get that. we have heard it enough. seabeyond Jun 2014 #64
I've heard my nephews use it to describe males, but it was praise, similar to 'stud-muffin'. Flatulo Jun 2014 #69
absolutely and why lie to ourselves. certainly will not encourage progression. seabeyond Jun 2014 #71
Uh I find that not believable.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #54
Then take it up with him. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #63
I am BainsBane Jun 2014 #6
Thank you, that is a VERY important point. redqueen Jun 2014 #8
exactly! Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #17
I never liked it at all. MH1 Jun 2014 #7
I totally agree! DesertDiamond Jun 2014 #9
Never heard the term Android3.14 Jun 2014 #10
you have now. Welcome. What is your first impression of the term? Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #30
Sounds cumbersome Android3.14 Jun 2014 #46
you think those workers are slut shaming that woman ... ? Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #47
If it's that complicated Android3.14 Jun 2014 #53
Why shame anyone for their sexual proclivities? Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #61
Yeah. It sucks. This whole concept of "taking back" terminology doesn't work. Squinch Jun 2014 #11
Exactly, thank you for saying it so well. redqueen Jun 2014 #27
Speaking as someone who hates the word "slut," I think the phrase "slut-shaming" StevieM Jun 2014 #13
your post makes no sense to me. Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #24
Yes, I understand the way it's used, but it doesn't change the fact redqueen Jun 2014 #28
I think you are correct about how it is meant, but the fact remains that we are Squinch Jun 2014 #56
yes. i am saying to my boys. that there is even a term, is the issue. seabeyond Jun 2014 #14
I see the term as a positive development paulkienitz Jun 2014 #15
? Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #18
I'm saying the same as Stevie M paulkienitz Jun 2014 #20
his post makes no sense to me, either. Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #25
read baines above. the point. approaching as you do also allows the prude shaming. same thing, seabeyond Jun 2014 #19
that may be true but this is still a step forward from the prior status quo paulkienitz Jun 2014 #21
not "that may be true". it is true. and it matters. and no. it is not a step forward. it is seabeyond Jun 2014 #22
in what way, to meet these standards, should the public respond to someone calling "slut"? paulkienitz Jun 2014 #26
I'll agree it's lazy. boston bean Jun 2014 #23
It is a clumsy way to get the point across, though. redqueen Jun 2014 #29
We probably need a word or phrase that includes boston bean Jun 2014 #31
'Misogyny' works for me. nt redqueen Jun 2014 #33
Nailed that one, RQ. n/t malthaussen Jun 2014 #41
You're right. That standard is never applied to men. Rozlee Jun 2014 #35
and this is what we should go after. the god like status we give male sexuality. i call bullshit. nt seabeyond Jun 2014 #44
Not in my lexicon, as it happens. malthaussen Jun 2014 #32
It's a useless term. redqueen Jun 2014 #37
No, it's a useful term. malthaussen Jun 2014 #39
I think you and I have had discussions about a particular term that you have used msanthrope Jun 2014 #34
then discuss it with the pro porn people, that you obsess so over that terminology. seabeyond Jun 2014 #45
I have never met a male, or a "pro-porn" person on this board who has used the term I am msanthrope Jun 2014 #58
If you google that term, 5 of the top 10 returns are porn. MadrasT Jun 2014 #59
If I google that term on this site, the results are exactly as I have noted. I do not msanthrope Jun 2014 #60
you KNOW the context it was used. and you are using THAT to attack a poster you do not like seabeyond Jun 2014 #65
Thanks for a perspective I hasn't considered theHandpuppet Jun 2014 #36
It is just one facet of the turd gem that is sexual prejudice. Half-Century Man Jun 2014 #38
I predominantly used the word slut mackerel Jun 2014 #40
Me. I tried it out a few times, and I was never comfortable with it ismnotwasm Jun 2014 #42
I think most feminists have realized that reclaiming it is only possible for privileged women. redqueen Jun 2014 #43
It is indeed praise Flatulo Jun 2014 #70
I deplore it. MadrasT Jun 2014 #49
Because it exists Warpy Jun 2014 #51
I know that misogynist assholes and ignorant people use the word 'slut'. redqueen Jun 2014 #57
I don't really get it... Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #66
I have ALWAYS despised this saying TorchTheWitch Jun 2014 #67
Wish I could rec your post. redqueen Jun 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Who else here is sick to ...»Reply #10