Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: An example of junk science re: objectification. [View all]redqueen
(115,164 posts)3. This part:
"We can't just pin this on the men. Women are perceiving women this way, too," Gervais said. "It could be related to different motives. Men might be doing it because they're interested in potential mates, while women may do it as more of a comparison with themselves. But what we do know is that they're both doing it."
All this guessing as to motive, all the feigned surprise (at least I hope it's feigned) that women do it too... The subjects weren't from wildly different cultures with vastly different messages from society and media about which sex was the subject and which the object than vast majority of the time.
Then again a large amount of people have spent the last several decades desperately attempting to downplay the consequences of constant objectification... so it's hardly surprising.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
" you sound like a climate-change denier?"" I am being thoroughly civil here." ah, no.
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#14
you have made it clear since it made "peer-reviewed academic journal" it is valid.
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#15
totally amazing tying evo babble to this when from the day girls and boys are born they are taught
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#11
there is plenty of documentation that challenges this. you obviously did not read any of it. to me,
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#23
unilaterally attack Evolutionary Psychology is to deny that there is any part of human behaviour
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#25
i can say the same right back at you. so why bother? i have no desire to converse with a person
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#27
I am also having trouble seeing any assertion about natural behavior or evo-psych
MadrasT
Jul 2012
#4
evo babble dismisses all of history for the first moment in time. they ignore conditioning, nurture,
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#16
see... this is exactly the crap i am talking about. you define it thru this period of time
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#29
there are many explanations about the issues with evo psych. here are 6 major, not even the minor
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#21
this would be a never ending process we do with women. but hell, lets not consider
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#31