History of Feminism

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

29. see... this is exactly the crap i am talking about. you define it thru this period of time

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:25 AM

Jul 2012

it is a naked body. so today, we all yell.... see porn. there was porn way back then. gotcha.

then the story is told. it is a body of a naked women. if it were truly about the evolutionary psychology that is being spouted today, there would be a totally different figure there, cause what they suggest today in evolutionary psychology is there was only certain "hot" and "attractive" women for the alpha male way back then, and this was not it.

but, .... just take today and who we are and overlay it with way back then, coming to our conclusions.

way too easy and lazy.

thank you for the exact example i am talking about.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

An example of junk science re: objectification. [View all] redqueen Jul 2012 OP

Science, no, ideology yes. hifiguy Jul 2012 #1

Uh, yeah... I can read, thanks. redqueen Jul 2012 #5

Peer-reviewed science is what it is. hifiguy Jul 2012 #6

Do you understand what those words mean? redqueen Jul 2012 #8

I certainly do. hifiguy Jul 2012 #10

Her methodology is sound I'm sure. redqueen Jul 2012 #12

There is no abusive language and the parallel is appropriate. hifiguy Jul 2012 #17

" you sound like a climate-change denier?"" I am being thoroughly civil here." ah, no. seabeyond Jul 2012 #14

do you have the fainist idea how much you sound like an evo babbler??? seabeyond Jul 2012 #9

The one and ONLY pont I made in post #1 hifiguy Jul 2012 #13

you have made it clear since it made "peer-reviewed academic journal" it is valid. seabeyond Jul 2012 #15

Your statement is faith-based hifiguy Jul 2012 #18

you would be wrong, but dont let that stop you. nt seabeyond Jul 2012 #19

How do you infer Evo? One_Life_To_Give Jul 2012 #2

This part: redqueen Jul 2012 #3

totally amazing tying evo babble to this when from the day girls and boys are born they are taught seabeyond Jul 2012 #11

Actually it is not hard to imagine an experiment hifiguy Jul 2012 #22

there is plenty of documentation that challenges this. you obviously did not read any of it. to me, seabeyond Jul 2012 #23

Actually, I read that link, and most of the comments. hifiguy Jul 2012 #24

unilaterally attack Evolutionary Psychology is to deny that there is any part of human behaviour seabeyond Jul 2012 #25

Jeezus. hifiguy Jul 2012 #26

i can say the same right back at you. so why bother? i have no desire to converse with a person seabeyond Jul 2012 #27

I "throw out insults" hifiguy Jul 2012 #34

I am also having trouble seeing any assertion about natural behavior or evo-psych MadrasT Jul 2012 #4

In addition to the comment quoted in post three, there's this... redqueen Jul 2012 #7

Ahhhhhhhhh MadrasT Jul 2012 #35

evo babble dismisses all of history for the first moment in time. they ignore conditioning, nurture, seabeyond Jul 2012 #16

Explain this: pscot Jul 2012 #28

see... this is exactly the crap i am talking about. you define it thru this period of time seabeyond Jul 2012 #29

Peer reviewed it may be ismnotwasm Jul 2012 #20

there are many explanations about the issues with evo psych. here are 6 major, not even the minor seabeyond Jul 2012 #21

Like clockwork... redqueen Jul 2012 #30

this would be a never ending process we do with women. but hell, lets not consider seabeyond Jul 2012 #31

I guess that writer at iO9 had no problem seizing onto the evo psych angle. redqueen Jul 2012 #32

"the media is probably a prime suspect." seabeyond Jul 2012 #33