Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Populist Reform of the Democratic Party

CobaltBlue

(1,122 posts)

17. Two points

Reply to demwing (Original post)

Thu Apr 28, 2016, 03:48 AM

Apr 2016

• I never read anything from CNBC, which is utterly repulsive and corrupt

• Elizabeth Warren is a lead; not a supporting player. Given her decision not to run for president—and that she is the only worthy “Democratic Party” (at least two years) office holder worthy of that job—she should be the next majority leader of the U.S. Senate but we all know damn well Wall Street Democrat Chuck Schumer will get that job. (But, of course, that may be ideal. It may not be worth having.)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Warren would be a horrible VP for Progressives [View all] demwing Apr 2016 OP

Warren is a horrible choice because she has a house flipping problem leftofcool Apr 2016 #1

Warren is also smarter than, and more likable than Clinton demwing Apr 2016 #5

Goldman-Sachs will be Hillary's choice. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #10

I got nothing to add 'cept a kick Kalidurga Apr 2016 #2

I love Warren, and I agree, it would be a bad decision. TDale313 Apr 2016 #3

She won't choose anyone progressive. Maybe Goldman-Sachs. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #11

Totally agree. It's funny we both used the word "muzzle" to describe what they would do to her! reformist2 Apr 2016 #4

which is what drew me to your post! demwing Apr 2016 #6

Clinton is going to ruin Warren's chance at POTUS anyway... Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #7

Yes, I think along the same lines demwing Apr 2016 #12

Elizabeth isn't on the same team as Hillary Hydra Apr 2016 #8

The only way Warren would agree to the VP slot would be if HRC were forced to bow out leveymg Apr 2016 #9

Why Elizabeth Warren would never accept any position with Hillary aurelius2112 Apr 2016 #13

To me the decision is as easy as imagining what would happen when a reporter rhett o rick Apr 2016 #14

In the end, Clinton would never pick Warren demwing Apr 2016 #15

Yes I agree. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #16

Two points CobaltBlue Apr 2016 #17