Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
34. I may not be the best person to speak, but if your kid's life is danger or your own, you might
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 01:10 AM
Jul 2015

become a single issue voter. Let me veer briefly from the so-called wedge issues.

Let's say, heaven forbid, that someone's child had a serious pre-existing medical condition that the family could not afford to take care of and one candidate was running on Medicare for all and another was running on ending Obamacare, Medicaid and Medicare. I would expect that parent to become a single issue voter really fast. In that parent's shoes, I would not be worried about foreign policy or interest rates on student loans or anything else.

In your case, your daughter is lesbian and you are a Democrat, so you probably did vote for the most pro GLBT candidate you could. I vote in Massachusetts, where Catholicism is a force, though much less than it was a few decades ago. My rep, a Catholic, though a fiercely pro-union Democrat used to be wobbly on choice and equal rights for members of the GLBT community. He has since changed his stand. And mercifully, I never had to vote for him before he changed because he doesn't get many primary challenges. But, if someone more socially liberal had a challenged him in a primary, I'm guessing you would have chosen the candidate best for your daughter no matter how good for unions my rep is.

If your daughter had been born a few decades earlier and had had the courage to come out to herself and then to you, you may have been a one issue voter as well. Especially if she were a guy. Lesbians got away with being "tomboys" or sports minded or whatever people told themselves about more masculine women then. Men who were more feminine did not get a pass, then, though, even if they were hetero.

BlueNorthwest is older than your daughter and came up in an era when NYC police would regularly go to gay bars and literally billy club people for nothing other than being in the bar--and the general public was more than fine with that. Police got cheered the same way Bostonians cheered them when they announced they had found Tsarnaev. No one would hire someone even suspected of being gay. And on and on. I totally understand his being a one issue voter.

If I thought Sanders were a racist or even indifferent to African Americans, I don't know who I would vote for in this primary. I see the other two candidates whom I might otherwise consider as more questionable on matters of race than Bernie, as well as on other matters. (Some older, prominent African Americans see war as a race issue, too.) It's not that race is unimportant to me, but that I see Sanders and his record very differently than some African Americans are seeing him and his record. I don't know what to do about that difference in perception. Maybe only African Americans who see him and his record differently can do something about that?

As far as people changing their candidatd because of how some DUers post or tweet, that I cannot understand. But I do understand being a single issue voter when your life and/or your child's life is at risk. And your entire community's lives.

Huddle Up: WEDGE ISSUES [View all] Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 OP
Racial issues are emerging as the 'kicker' for this election. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #1
Agreed, lets get on the just side of history! Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #4
K&R! marym625 Jul 2015 #2
Can do! Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #5
Great! I will look for it marym625 Jul 2015 #7
Look in GD: Primary Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #8
Ta-Done! marym625 Jul 2015 #9
wedge issues have done a spectacular job, of splitting the 99 percent against each other HFRN Jul 2015 #3
Indeed! George Carlin spoke about that often. Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #6
"The devil works by pointing out our differences" zeemike Jul 2015 #20
Thanks Zeemike. Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #27
I have no interest in "winning DU," nor do I think it's possible. Alternatively, DU was won months merrily Jul 2015 #10
Yep, 90% Pro Bernie Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #11
democrats I've been talking to heaven05 Jul 2015 #19
"Keep fooling yourself." Hi, heaven05. Nice to see you. merrily Jul 2015 #21
people of all stripes heaven05 Jul 2015 #22
But, my post said: I have no interest in "winning DU," nor do I think it's possible. merrily Jul 2015 #28
You're promoting a false narrative and hammering the WEDGE Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #30
I know I just get heaven05 Jul 2015 #32
heaven05. I always welcome your posts and our conversations. merrily Jul 2015 #33
WE can "impact it" heaven05 Jul 2015 #35
Honestly, I don't know how. merrily Jul 2015 #36
we have a right to post anything about the heaven05 Jul 2015 #37
AFAIK, you conduct yourself just fine in my book. merrily Jul 2015 #38
Calling other people's basic rights 'a wedge issue' is inherently problematic. Bluenorthwest Jul 2015 #12
We have a communication breakdown Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #13
I have a question wrt Identity Politics 2banon Jul 2015 #31
I may not be the best person to speak, but if your kid's life is danger or your own, you might merrily Jul 2015 #34
...... daleanime Jul 2015 #14
Despite any possible future disagreements JackInGreen Jul 2015 #15
Thanks, United We Stand, Divided We Fall Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #17
K&R Moral Compass Jul 2015 #16
Bingo! Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #18
Could not agree anymore on this topic! d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #23
Thanks for that apropos example Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #25
Fer sher! d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #29
The USNews article is a primer on how to use WEDGE issues to divide the GOP, not Dems. McCamy Taylor Jul 2015 #24
Exactly! Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #26
I prefer the truth bombs reframing the conversation as a method of sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #39
Thanks. Maybe we need to examine how... Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #40
Study Karl Rove's Machiavellian tactics. Then match them to the 'talking points' sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #41
Recently, some pundit or other on MSNBC quoted Bubba as having said, merrily Jul 2015 #43
In general people are disgusted with the nastiness except for the sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #44
Yes, but candidates still hope to disqualify each other. And, sometimes they succeed. merrily Jul 2015 #45
Yes, they do, but that's the people's fault. They are less likely to allow sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #46
The fissures do not need identification. They've been known here since forever. merrily Jul 2015 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Huddle Up: WEDGE ISSUES»Reply #34