Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
11. I agree and add it is NOT in her interest to do so - it is a good idea only as a long shot
Wed Jan 8, 2020, 11:24 AM
Jan 2020

Last edited Wed Jan 8, 2020, 12:53 PM - Edit history (1)

At this point, she is one of three people most likely to become the nominee. As such, she needs to be seen speaking about the good things she will do as President. Appearing positive, exuding energy and sending out calls for people to join her will make her stronger. Obviously, she must answer attacks made on her because to not to that would make her seem weak. Even then, her responses are better when she leads from her strength - facts, intelligence and a clear clarification.

However, Biden has not attacked her, nor have any of his prominent endorsers. At this moment, foreign policy is a big issue and the contrast should be between the rational Obama administration and the chaos of Trump. While Biden was an important member of that administration, any Democratic candidate - including possibly Sanders - will in the general election want to speak of the deep foreign policy bench - many from the Obama administration - who they will call on to take on the challenge of restoring the US on the international stage.

Warren is very uniquely positioned. I think the media for the most part misses that as they create their narrative of "lanes" which helps them simplify the complex choices many voters make. She has the potential to gain many undecided Clinton voters, while also gaining some undecided Sanders 2016 voters. That is probably more likely if she is not seen as attacking either Biden or Sanders.

Thinking of many past primaries, consider how both Howard Dean and Dick Gephardt, the two leading candidates in Iowa a month out before Iowa, both imploded after getting into a series of negative attacks on each other. I think both would still have lost to John Kerry as more people saw and heard him, unless one of them would have so quickly become the frontrunner that he had no chance at being heard.

More than in 2004, there are many of us that want to see a unified, positive Democratic party making a case for leaving the world of chaos where everything can turn on its head with a thoughtless tweet and which is focused on repairing our place in the world, leading the country, the businesses and the world to work against climate change, to repair the holes carved in the social network - including fixing health care availability. The primaries always focus on the relatively narrow differences, but care needs to be taken to point out how unified all the candidates are on basic goals, differing on the way to achieve them.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Warren is killing it on Morning Joe [View all] Dem4Life1102 Jan 2020 OP
She is incredibly smart NOT to attack Biden. To do so will backfire on any who do so. hlthe2b Jan 2020 #1
Yes, and they actually care about our Country Cha Jan 2020 #46
Credit to her for putting up with that horrid crowd. BeckyDem Jan 2020 #2
..they all need to think of the VEEP position and Im sure all of them samnsara Jan 2020 #3
She's not thinking VEEP. She's being herself. blm Jan 2020 #8
I agree and add it is NOT in her interest to do so - it is a good idea only as a long shot karynnj Jan 2020 #11
Good post, IMO! BlueMTexpat Jan 2020 #14
+2 mr_lebowski Jan 2020 #30
This! BlueMTexpat Jan 2020 #13
I agree. She needs to stay in the Senate if she doesn't win the nomination. She has a GOP Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #15
but the dems have veto proof majorities.... getagrip_already Jan 2020 #27
It doesn't matter...if a GOP could win a governorsip....he /she could win a special election and did Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #31
the only republicans to win gov or senate recently... getagrip_already Jan 2020 #33
AND, she's getting mileage out of her statement "I took an oath" when asked about running CTyankee Jan 2020 #50
Good to hear. thanks for post. riversedge Jan 2020 #4
Good... Happy Hoosier Jan 2020 #5
She was attacked for 3months before she joined the fray. She wasn't very blm Jan 2020 #6
I do not recall Warren being attacked for four months... Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #16
she was attacked.... getagrip_already Jan 2020 #29
I thought they meant she was attacked by Democrats...one expects the GOP idiots to attack Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #32
it still hurt her with dems..... getagrip_already Jan 2020 #34
I honestly didn't pay any attention to this...stupid controversy. Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #44
She was quite good mcar Jan 2020 #7
I have pretty much turned MSNBC off except for the last hour because of the Biden bashing I see Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #18
What was Mika saying, mcar? Cha Jan 2020 #47
Does she still attack Mayor Pete? left-of-center2012 Jan 2020 #9
No Dem4Life1102 Jan 2020 #10
Does he still attack her? blm Jan 2020 #12
you mean when he correctly pointed out that she transferred that evil money to her campaign dsc Jan 2020 #17
umadbro? Act_of_Reparation Jan 2020 #19
I was impressed with Warren this morning. True Blue American Jan 2020 #22
That is fair. And I think that is why her numbers declined. Although she seems to have stabilized Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #21
Joe has the kind of AA numbers that HRC had at this point in 2008 bigbrother05 Jan 2020 #28
I don't agree. I see reasons why neither Sanders, Warren or Buttigieg have AA support... Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #35
As an AA, all I can say is: You. Nailed. It. Skya Rhen Jan 2020 #37
I live in a diverse area...my neighbors are AA ...when I work campaigns ...they are my fellow Demsrule86 Jan 2020 #38
Not gonna get flack from me, agree as per usual ... mr_lebowski Jan 2020 #36
agreed left-of-center2012 Jan 2020 #24
You mean candidates should NEVER stop having big $ fundraisers blm Jan 2020 #39
She should have given the money back dsc Jan 2020 #40
Why? Surely Pete camp must be ecstatic that she has limited her fundraising blm Jan 2020 #41
because the money is evil and corrupting according to her dsc Jan 2020 #42
The money was from her 18 senate campaign raised by party machine blm Jan 2020 #43
I am not the one who says the money is evil and corrupting, she is dsc Jan 2020 #45
Exaggerating her comments is a great strategy. blm Jan 2020 #48
No he didn't dsc Jan 2020 #51
She attached a timeline, dsc. ENORMOUSLY criminal of her. blm Jan 2020 #52
So his timeline bad hers good dsc Jan 2020 #53
The Dem senate machine has those fundraisers in place. blm Jan 2020 #54
She was recruited in 2012 the money is from 2018 dsc Jan 2020 #56
I get why you need to exaggerate, dsc. blm Jan 2020 #57
If you want to accuse me of lying then be adult enough to do so dsc Jan 2020 #58
I view it as exaggerating, dsc. You maximize if it's against Warren and blm Jan 2020 #59
If she didn't realize she would have money left over after running against that cream puff dsc Jan 2020 #60
And Pete will be explaining why his support for Med4All in 2018 blm Jan 2020 #61
Yes, EW was in the wrong there.. Wine Caves!.. and Cha Jan 2020 #49
Yes, because we now know Warren's a liar, an elitist, a stubborn woman, blm Jan 2020 #55
"Does he still attack her?" left-of-center2012 Jan 2020 #23
She's got my vote. Nitram Jan 2020 #20
Super smart and can think on her feet, par excellence not fooled Jan 2020 #25
Warren was excellent. guillaumeb Jan 2020 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Warren is killing it on M...»Reply #11