Laurence Tribe, the Constitutional law prof at Harvard, has concerns about Bernie.

[Jarqui]

44. A bunch of this is nonsense

"No one ever cared what sanders thought before this cycle."
Nonsense.

"The man has passed no meaningful legislation"
He's an independent and a critic of both parties.
He was the first independent successfully elected to congress in 40 years.
He was a critic of both parties - so he was treated as an outsider by both parties.
In more recent years, he was allowed to caucus with the Dems on some stuff.
The parties control the legislation from their members. They're not going to give an independent who criticizes them a fair shot.
What he did do from that position is all he could: he was the amendment king - he successfully got more amendments through than anyone else.

It is ignorant to attack his legislation record and not look at that.

" and no one bother to vet him. "
He has been running for office for 47 years.
All those he ran against and the media around him were vetting him on his positions and anything else they could find.
He did not get 47 years of free passes to elected office - particularly on the path he took - as an independent.

"He has no policies. Only slogans"
That's utter nonsense.
I supported Hillary. I switched to Sanders during the 2016 cycle.
The key reason: his policies were more progressive and in step with what I wanted to see happen.
Want to see them from May 2016:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160531080847/https://berniesanders.com/issues/

Here's more on what he said about Financial Institutions and Wall Street

Wall Street cannot continue to be an island unto itself, gambling trillions in risky financial decisions while expecting the public to bail it out.

It is time to break up the largest financial institutions in the country.

The six largest financial institutions in this country today hold assets equal to about 60% of the nation’s gross domestic product. These six banks issue more than two-thirds of all credit cards and over 35% of all mortgages. They control 95% of all derivatives and hold more than 40% of all bank deposits in the United States.

We must break up too-big-to-fail financial institutions. Those institutions received a $700 billion bailout from the US taxpayer, and more than $16 trillion in virtually zero interest loans from the Federal Reserve. Despite that, financial institutions made over $152 billion in profit in 2014 – the most profitable year on record, and three of the four largest financial institutions are 80% bigger today than they were before we bailed them out. ‎

Our banking system must be part of the productive, job-creating economy. The Federal Reserve, a government entity which serves as the engine of the banking industry, must eliminate its internal conflicts of interest, provide stricter oversight, and insist that the banks serve the economy in a way that works for everyone, not just a few.

If a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist.

These institutions have acquired too much economic and political power, endangering our economy and our political process.

KEY ACTIONS
Introduced the “Too Big to Fail, Too Big to Exist Act,” which would break up the big banks and prohibit any too-big-to-fail institutions from accessing the Federal Reserve’s discount facilities or using insured deposits for risky activities.
Led the fight in 1999 defending Glass-Steagall provisions which prevented banks (especially “too big to fail” ones) from gambling with customers’ money, and currently is a co-sponsor of the Elizabeth Warren/John McCain bill to reinstate those provisions.
Has proposed a financial transaction tax which will reduce risky and unproductive high-speed trading and other forms of Wall Street speculation; proceeds would be used to provide debt-free public college education.
Is co-sponsoring Sen. Tammy Baldwin’s bill to end Wall Street’s practice of paying big bonuses to bank executives who take senior-level government jobs.
Introduced a tax on Wall Street speculation to make public colleges and universities tuition-free
Supports capping credit card interest rates at 15%.
Sponsored an amendment calling for an audit the Federal Reserve. The audit found that far more had been spent in the Wall Street bailout than previously disclosed, and that considerable funds had been spent to bail out foreign corporations.
Warned about the risks of deregulation eight years before the fiscal crisis of 2008.
Has proposed limiting the ability of bankers to get rich from taxpayer bailouts of their institutions

They're not slogans. They're specific ideas.

Here is Hillary's Wall Street program:

Hillary Clinton has long stood up to Wall Street – going back to her time as New York Senator, when she warned against abuses nearly a year before the crisis hit. While Senator Sanders pushes proposals scrutinized as unachievable and lacking detail beyond a slogan, Clinton has the strongest, most comprehensive plan to tackle risks on Wall Street and in the financial sector. As president, she would:

Defend Dodd-Frank against Republican attacks.
Impose a risk fee on the largest financial institutions and a tax on high-frequency trading.
Require firms that are too risky to manage to reorganize or even break apart.
Strengthen the Volcker Rule.
Strengthen oversight of the “shadow banking” system to reduce risk.
Hold individuals, not just corporations, accountable when they break the law, including through criminal prosecution.
Ensure that the financial sector serves the interests of investors and consumers, not just itself.
Slow the revolving door between the financial industry and government financial regulators.

"More will be coming out. Just be patient."

BS. Bernie's been hearing that for 47 years. How many more years are we supposed to wait?
You're trying to make folks fear some grand notion unique to Bernie that doesn't exist.