You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British troops must stay in Iraq as Nato dithers [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 12:40 AM
Original message
British troops must stay in Iraq as Nato dithers
Advertisements [?]
The Army's long-heralded deployment to Afghanistan has been postponed by several months as other Nato countries dither over putting their troops in jeopardy. It means that, despite Tony Blair's hints during a visit to Basra before Christmas, there will be no substantial troop reductions in Iraq this year. Ministers must decide next week whether to take the risk of sending a larger force than was originally planned to Helmand province in south Afghanistan, putting even greater pressure on overstretched infantry battalions. That decision will be influenced by whether the Dutch parliament agrees to send 1,200 troops to Afghanistan as Nato moves into territory previously patrolled by the US.

If the Dutch refuse, the alliance will have to look elsewhere and there is a distant possibility that Britain's spearhead battalion, which can be deployed at very short notice, could plug the gap for six months. A spokesman for the Dutch defence ministry rated the chances of agreement on the deployment at "50-50". Members of 3 Para and a squadron of Apache helicopters have been training since the autumn and three ships loaded with stores and equipment have been tied up in Karachi waiting for the deployment to go ahead.

More than 300 troops, including special forces, are in Helmand preparing for the contingent's arrival. John Reid, the Defence Secretary, must win the agreement of colleagues at next week's Cabinet meeting to a force of almost 4,000 troops in Afghanistan. A Whitehall source said: "Potentially we could go it alone but this would need every minister's support and could easily become a hot potato." There is still great uncertainty over the precise role the troops will play and a lack of clarity over tackling the illicit opium economy. Defence chiefs have stated that the soldiers will not actively pursue the Taliban or al-Qa'eda terrorists and are there to protect "provincial reconstruction teams".

A Nato source said it was never easy to make up the numbers for missions in which there was a possibility of fighting terrorists. "Some nations are concerned about being too close to anti-terrorist operations and links with America," he said. "If the Dutch fail to provide the troops it will be a serious problem but we will find a way through it."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/01/17/wafg17.xml&DCMP=EMC-new_17012006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC