You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: It is difficult to be the first to rush, but this actually might work [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
29. It is difficult to be the first to rush, but this actually might work
It's only a couple of dozen feet in most classrooms to attack any given shooter and can be done in a couple of seconds. But nobody wants to be first, because they don't want to be the first one shot. Look at United 93; nobody attacked until they learned the Twin Tower fell. They spend a lot of time working themselves up into a frenzy before storming up the plane and into the cockpit.

A determined shooter can fire maybe three rounds per second from a autoloading pistol, so maybe six to nine shots could be fired before the first students tackle the shooter. Less, if the students throw textbooks and bookbags just befored they charged to distract the shooter.

Also, a shooter charged by several people will also probably hesitate because of several reasons. One, he's lost the initiative. He thought "I have gun, I am the aggressor", and now that's been violently and quickly turned. Two, now he had to pick out a target, and trying to pick the most dangerous threat attacking him will also slow him down.

Finally, once he engages an attacker, he will most likely be looking at the person charging him, not at the front sight like he should. This drastically reduces his chances of scoring hits, so he will have to fire several rounds at his attacker. Most likely he would only have time to engage one attacker before he was fighting hand-to-hand for control of the gun.

This is perhaps an optimistic view, but the view that the attacker is some sort of para-military killing machine is I think unduly pessimistic. People that don't use guns a lot often times think that simply having one in your hands makes you invulnerable to attack, and that is simply false confidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC