You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #92: I think that was re: a couple credit card companies. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. I think that was re: a couple credit card companies.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac don't actually take in deposits and loan money out the way a bank does. They package groups of similar mortgages into bunches and sell them just like bonds/treasuries. They tend to act very similarly to a 10-yr treasury security in terms of payout over time (people don't usually hold 30yr mortgages for 30 years.)

Of course there is more risk associated with mortgage securites than treasuries (default risk of the underlying mortgages to the extent collateral value exceeds real market value at foreclosure - but that's why these loans are never for more than 80% of a home's value, it would take a massive crash to destroy more than 20% overall), so they pay a higher return.

A couple credit card companies have started to do the same thing. They are no longer "banks" in the sense that they loan out deposits. They "securitize" bundles of credit card assets into something very like a bond. They essentially borrow the money to loan out to the credit card customers. Some people find this attractive because of the much higher rates they pay, but (as I suspect you would guess), the default rate on credit cards is MUCH higher and MUCH more variable... so these securities are much riskier. There is some measure of protection in that the rates are also much higher and they can absorb a pretty hefty loss ratio and still pay out the expected income.

It effectively shoves part of the risk involved in credit card lending out to the investors (while giving income investors another -higher paying - option) and takes it off the back of the "bank".

The practice is not acceptable in my mind. But I don't get to make the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC