Reply #54: And again I direct you to post #37. [View All]

[DRoseDARs]

A jury of their peers felt the evidence presented in court against the accused was sufficient to warrant convictions. Threatening and violent comments, coupled with the publication of private personal information of the people their comments were directed at, apparently rises to the level of "inciting violence" which doesn't require the actual violence to occur. Have you objected to people being arrested and convicted of making threats against the President? They haven't actually done anything to the President and pretty much none of them realistically ever had the means to, but evidently it's enough for them to be prosecuted. That you don't understand this is nothing short of depressing; it's this kind of willful myopy that allows anti-abortionists to get away with the violence they do without it being called what it is: Terrorism.