Reply #1: Very nice article. [View All]

[cliss]

I agree: I think everyone now has reached a consensus: Bush is a complete and total failure. I can't think of anything good he's done during his reign, other than motivate other countries to unite and work together against this usurper.

Now, as far as Bush being the worst in a small group of "worsts", I would venture to say that Bush needs to be in a category all his own. There needs to be a category of "Most damaging to the most number of people" around the world. Bush would hold the undisputed Blue-Ribbon Champion title to that category.


The presidents on this "worst" list had their tenure quite a while ago. The world was not as globalized as it is today. If these men goofed up, chances are the problems were mostly domestic. Now, that's not to minimize the amount of damage these men did to Americans, and I'm sure there were other categories that were hurt, like maybe foreign trade or some diplomatic issues.

But NOTHING like the power Bush holds today. And that's the reason why you have demonstrations all over the world against Bush, like the ones marching downtown London holding signs "The world's biggest terrorist: George Bush".

Bush's reach goes farther than any other past "loser" president.

And that's exactly what makes him so dangerous.

Thanks for posting.