Reply #125: "Assumes Facts not in Evidence" is some lawyer talk I picked [View All]

[petgoat]

up from a girlfriend once.

Buildings don't fall down by themselves. They don't fall down from fires, either.
Assymetrical damage should yield assymetrical collapse, else all the highly paid
controlled demolitionists would have to do is drive a tank truck into a condemned
building, set it on fire, and set off a few random cutting charges.

Jones was NOT associated with the Pons and Fleischman debacle. His conclusions
were far more modest, and in fact P&F rushed their work into print because
Jones was a rival.

Jones's amusing study of hand injuries in figures in Mayan art was probably meant
to be nothing more than an amusing study.

And in fact, structural engineers do NOT know what happened. FEMA apparently
did not believe the mutually contradictory tales of structural damage, and
concluded that fires brought WTC7 down, though they couldn't explain how.

NIST apparently can't support the fires, and invents gaping ten-story holes in
the structure for which there is no photographic corroboration. NIST's report
was to be finalized in December but they haven't released it yet; apparently
the latest is that they're going to outsource it.