You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: My point was that the mobile vets were a 501C3 organization. They are [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. My point was that the mobile vets were a 501C3 organization. They are
a group that gets funding from sources other than the fees charged for the spay/neuter service.

However, here was no difference in the level of post op care for my cats done by the 501C3 and the veterinary hospital we usuaally used.

Except that all three of the cats I had spayed/nuetered by the 501C3 vets came through the process with no noticable problems (except that one female took longer to recover than the other). The one done by the vet hospital was traumatized and never completely recovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC