Reply #7: OK so all the above are better that Bush! [View All]

[bernynhel]

On that we agree but yet so many want to debate on who would be a better president or Hillary said this or Obama's minister said that - how about this: I'm for Clinton AND Obama - in that order! 8 years for Clinton then 8 years for Obama. It will be such a relief knowing that that asshole is anywhere else doing anything else I don't want it to last only 8 years! Hillary'd be great (or so) but if not elected in November how likely is it that she will run again in '17? Not as likely as Obama! And wouldn't we agree that Obama, if not elected this time, would very likely run again eight years from now and still be viable? That should be the focus of anyone hoping to keep the GOP from the presidency for a period of time that could really make a dent in the damage from the last eight years! Why alienate or otherwise paint Clinton or Obama in a funky light in the eyes of future supporters or anyone else for that matter when we all agree either would be relief from the Bush crisis? Even good presidents, maybe! It's a good concept to rally around instead of everybody playing Nancy Grace on behalf of their favorite candidate-of-the-day and wasting all this effort on villifying two perfectly capable and popular candidates like we have not enjoyed the likes of for a long, long time. And someone needs to tell A Huffington to just shut up for a minute! Did anyone else hear her on Bill Maher Friday? Jeeziz!