You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: Duh! NOBODY has ever controlled Afghanistan for long [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
Slyder Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-20-09 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Duh! NOBODY has ever controlled Afghanistan for long
The area we call Afghanistan has never been a stable nation. It is an artificial state. (Merely Kabuled together--groan--I couldn't help myself.)The failures here are legion and I don't know all the details. This area has often been in the Persian cultural sphere, but not always controlled by Persia or Iran. The Persians had a time with it. Alexander the Great went though but didn't hold it long. Parts of the country became Buddhist due to the Silk Road. A Greek upper class seems to have controlled the area around Kandahar for a while. Sometimes urban culture supported by irrigated agriculture stabilized parts of the country. The Mongols destroyed cities and irrigation infrastructure in the 1200s. Some areas and cities never recovered. Timur came through. The Moguls controlled it for a while. Some of the worst defeats experienced by the British during the rise of their empire occurred in Afghanistan. Toward the end of the 20th century Russia tried to dominate Afghanistan with disastrous results. "Graveyard of Empires" is right! The fierce independence of the people, the rough and geographically isolated terrain, several languages and ethnic groups, and religious factions, make permanent peace almost hopeless. It is pure hubris to assume America will have a different experience.

Nation building has been going on in Afghanistan for thousands of years. It might happen, but I kind of doubt it. I have a bad feeling about continued instability in central Asia. This will be the source of terrorism for a while. There is a lot of real estate to monitor. We will need lots of speakers of obscure Turkish dialects, such as Uighur, and several Indo-European languages, and then Chinese, Arabic, Russian, Manchu(?), and Mongol. Ural-Altaic languages too, perhaps. This will not be easy,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC