Reply #68: No agreement to disagree, you are still repeating falsehoods [View All]

[tom_paine]

And I'm sorry, but the one kind of premise I can't agree to disagree with is one based on such misleading statements.

NO one, you say?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3323633.stm

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/06/05/sprj.irq.blix.report/

http://aljazeerah.info/News%20archives/2003%20News%20archives/September/18%20n/New%20UN%20arms-probe%20boss%20echoes%20Blix%20Iraq%20had%20no%20WMD.htm

(this is a reprint of a Reuters article, lest you correctly question the shoddy source)

Now proof that you have embraced falsehoods. The simple truth is that Blix and others DID say it, and quite credibly.

I will be happy to "agree to disagree" with ANY point of view, so long as it's credibly backed up.

I apologize for being so direct, but none of your assertions meet that criteria.