You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: Not a chance! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Not a chance!
You have some interesting informaiton there but the conclusion
you'd have to draw was that Kimmel was either grossly negligent
or a willing participant.

Kimmel was ultimately responsible for the defense of his base. But
he was also responsible for the counterattack. So he was
getting ready for the offense at the expense of defense. He grounded
his PBY's so that they would be at peak levels for the start of the
war. His reason was that he didn't have enough of them to cover
360 degrees from Pearl anyway. This was *his* order, and didn't come
from above. He also never made sure the Army was included in plans
for the base defense either. Why should he? Pearl was "safe" to the
extent of our best intel due to its distance.

At no point during his defense did he ever indicate that this
decision was made for him, which would have been his vindication
in one sentence. So:

a) He took the fall for FDR "knowing"
b) He made one of the very few mistakes he ever made

Either way, he should have been demoted. A sorry end for a fine man,
but fitting no matter what the semantics. He was the local commander
with adequate resources to protect himself yet he still got caught.

Besides, why do so many people not beleive the Japanese were pretty
darned capable warriors fully able to pull off this attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC